What is the equation for a spring launcher?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riman643
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Launcher Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the correct equation for a spring launcher, specifically how to incorporate the angle of launch. The user initially presents an equation for potential energy but struggles with its accuracy and the inclusion of launch angle. They propose a revised equation relating spring potential energy to gravitational work and kinetic energy. Feedback indicates that their latest attempt appears correct. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying physics principles to solve the problem.
Riman643
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
What is the generalized equation of the initial launch speed for a spring launcher at different angles? Use PE of the spring, mass, and angle in the equation.
Relevant Equations
Ei = Ef
PEspring = 1/2 kx^2
KE = 1/2 mv^2
I am really stuck and confused. I just need the equation. Thanks!

Here is my attempt at solving:

PEspring = 1/2m(Vx^2 +Vy^2)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Riman643 said:
Problem Statement: What is the generalized equation of the initial launch speed for a spring launcher at different angles? Use PE of the spring, mass, and angle in the equation.
Relevant Equations: Ei = Ef
PEspring = 1/2 kx^2
KE = 1/2 mv^2

I am really stuck and confused. I just need the equation. Thanks!
What have is your assessment so far?
 
This is my attempt

PEspring = 1/2m(Vx^2 +Vy^2). I know this is not right. I am confused and have been trying to figure this out for two days now. I do not know how to incorporate the angle of the launcher.
 
So here is my next attempt

PEspring = Wgrav + KE
(1/2)kx^2 = mgsin(theta)x + (1/2)mv^2

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Riman643 said:
So here is my next attempt

PEspring = Wgrav + KE
(1/2)kx^2 = mgsin(theta)x + (1/2)mv^2

Is this correct?
Looks right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top