MHB What is the equation for the line with the same x-intercept as -2x + y = 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line passing through (6, 2) and has the same x-intercept as the line -2x + y = 1. Express final answer in the form Ax + By + C = 0.

How do I find the x-intercept of the given line?

How do I express the final answer in the form given above?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Find an equation of the line passing through (6, 2) and has the same x-intercept as the line -2x + y = 1. Express final answer in the form Ax + By + C = 0.

How do I find the x-intercept of the given line?

How do I express the final answer in the form given above?

x intercept of a line is value of x when y = 0

for -2x + y = 1 we need to compute x when y= 0 we get $-2x = 1$ or $x= \frac{-1}{2}$. this is the x intercept
 
Great. I can take it from here. I suspected that letting y = 0 would yield the needed x-intercept but wanted to be sure.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top