What Is the Equation to Determine the Energy Content of Light?

AI Thread Summary
The equation to determine the energy content of a packet of light is Planck's Equation, E = hv. In this equation, E represents the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant (approximately 6.626068 x 10^-34 J s), and v is the frequency of the light. This formula is essential for calculating the energy associated with specific frequencies of light. Understanding this equation is crucial for various applications in physics and chemistry. The discussion emphasizes the importance of Planck's constant in these calculations.
kant101
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a question which was found on my Pre-lab

Q> State the equation that is used to determine the energy content of a packet of light of specific frequency.

Tried googling it,but couldn't find the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Planck's Equation,
E = hv
Where E is the energy contained within the photon of light, h is Plank's constant, and v is the frequency of the light.

Planck's constant, h, = 6.626068 E-34 J s
 
Thanks man! :)

mrjeffy321 said:
Planck's Equation,
E = hv
Where E is the energy contained within the photon of light, h is Plank's constant, and v is the frequency of the light.

Planck's constant, h, = 6.626068 E-34 J s
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top