What is the existence and value of the infimum of a polynomial function?

Felafel
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the function "P" defined by: P(x) := x^2n + a2n-1*x^2n-1 + ... + a1x + a0;
prove that there exists an x* in |R such that P(x*) = inf{P(x) : x belongs to | R}
Also, prove that:
|P(x*)| = inf{|P(x)| : x belongs to |R}


The Attempt at a Solution



As the function is the sum of continuous functions, it is contnuos too.
Then, I thought about the theorem according to which if we have a cont. function on a sequentially compact space, it has inf. and sup. therein.
But the space here is not sequentially compact.
Can I use this theorem all the same, by adding some restrictions, perhaps?

thanksss
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say separate your polynomial into it's even and odd powers.
IE P2 is all even powered x (including a0) and P1 is your odd, with some type of uniform bound on the coefficients. like |ak|<M
is this an analysis class? I assume so. we know P2>P1 at large x, and extremely small -x ( like -10^10 or whatever). your function goes to infinity on both sides. Since it is Continuous, think of how you could apply rolles theorem, squeeze theorem, IVT, and the fact that INF(aN+bN)>=Inf(aN)+Inf(bN)
 
thank you! i seem to have solved out the first question.
but how about the second part:
|P(x*)| = inf{|P(x)| : x belongs to |R}?
if I think about a parabola graphic with its vertex in, say, (0, -3), the vertex of the absolute value of the function (0, +3), is no more the infimum.
it would be possible if the infimum of this function were in the first or fourth quadrant, but i can't assume it, right?
 
I think assuming that the inf|P(x)|=/=inf(P(x)) in general is correct. unless there is a strict restrictions of P(x). you'll have two cases of x* that p(x*)=0 implies x* is in inf{|p(x)|}
or the inf is the same.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top