What is the explanation for using sin 30 in 2D kinematics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of sin 30 in calculating the vertical component of a tennis ball's initial velocity in a 2D kinematics problem. The vertical component is derived using the equation Vy,o = Vo sin(30), which is essential for determining how gravity affects the ball's ascent. As the ball reaches its peak height after 1 second, the vertical velocity becomes zero, allowing for the calculation of the initial velocity Vo using the equation 0 = Vo sin(30) - 9.8 m/s. The horizontal component of velocity remains constant, while only the vertical component changes over time. Understanding the separation of these components is crucial for accurately solving projectile motion problems.
Hemingway
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A tennis ball is thrown from ground level with velocity vo directed sin 30 above the horizontal. If it takes the ball 1.0s to reach the top of its trajectory, what is the magnitude of the initial velocity?


Homework Equations



The initial vertical component of velocity is

(1) Vy,o = Vo sin(30)

As the ball rises gravity slows the ball down until the vertical
velocity is zero. The equation that describes the vertical component
of velocity as a function of time is

(2) Vy = Vy,o - gt

Where g = 9.8m/s^2 is the magnitude of the acceleration due to
gravity and t is time. Now when t = 1s Vy = 0 (this corresponds
to the maximum height) so we have.

(3) 0 = Vy,o -g(1s)

Substituting (1) and g = 9.8m/s^2 into (3) gives

(4) 0 = Vo sin(30) - 9.8 m/s

solving for Vo

(5) Vo = (9.8 m/s)/ sin(30)

= (9.8 m/s)/ 0.5

= 19.6 m/s

********************
* *
* Vo = 19.6 m/s *
* *
********************

The Attempt at a Solution



Why am I using sin 30 - I understand that that is the y direction, but why is it not
0 = Vo - 9.8 (1)
Vo = -9.8, I understand this answer is not reasonable but I want to know the explanation for why I am using sin 30. I hope you understand what I am asking :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The horizontal component of the velocity (the one with cos30 in it) would not change with time. Only the vertical component is changing with time. So you would need to get the final vertical component of velocity at the specific time and then combine it with the constant horizontal component of the velocity to get the velocity.
 
rock.freak667 said:
The horizontal component of the velocity (the one with cos30 in it) would not change with time. Only the vertical component is changing with time. So you would need to get the final vertical component of velocity at the specific time and then combine it with the constant horizontal component of the velocity to get the velocity.

That was exactly what I was after - thank you very, very much :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top