What is the force exerted on a paddle in a river in the following situation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaguar7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force River
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on a paddle submerged in a river, considering factors like water velocity, pressure, and the paddle's angle. The user proposes a method to determine the mass of water impacting the paddle using the formula ρAvsinΘ, where ρ is water density and Θ is the angle of incidence. They then suggest calculating the rate of change of momentum to derive force, using the equation ρAv^2sinΘ. However, they note a potential oversight regarding the inclusion of the drag coefficient and the missing factor of one-half from the related article. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in accurately modeling the forces acting on the paddle in a flowing river.
jaguar7
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
If a paddle of area, A, is submerged in a river of water-velocity, v, and (assumed constant) water pressure, P, the paddle at an angle, m, what is the force exerted on the paddle by the moving water of the river?

the paddle is being held still from a bridge...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, the article (and its related articles) don't seem to give me everything I was looking for, and they seem a bit different from what I'd get.

I'm wondering if I'd be correct in my reasoning:

We could find out the mass per second that collides with the paddle, by the water's velocity, and its density, to give ρAvsinΘt = mass

where ρ is density, and Θ is the angle between the water and the paddle.

And with that, we could find its rate of change of momentum (imparted from the water to the paddle) per second which would be ρAv^2sinΘ

which would be force (Δp/Δt = F), where p = momentum

We add in the drag coefficient. But we are missing the one half, from the article.

Did I make a mistake somewhere? I had some help.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top