What is the functional iW[J] for a system with 2 sources or 3 sources?

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I have a hard time getting to know what this exponential W(J) really is about. What is it even called?

Zee writes:

Z(J) = Z(J=0) * e^(i W(J)), and I suppose that this is the term that should be evaluated by summing over all possible pair of sources?

What is W(J) for a system with 2 sources or 3 sources?

Thanks really much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I just wrote in my notes:

"The interpretation of W(J) is that we sum the amplitudes for all possible interactions between our sources."

Could somebody with more insight maybe just give me a right or wrong here?
 
W(J) is called the generating functional for the unconnected Green functions. The approach to QFT based on path integrals is well explained in the QFT books written by P. Ramond, D. Bailin and A. Love, L.H. Ryder. It all can be traced back to the 1965 book by Feynman and Hibbs.
 
Hymne said:
Hello!

I have a hard time getting to know what this exponential W(J) really is about. What is it even called?

Thanks really much!

iW[J], when multiplied by -kT, is a functional that's equal to the difference in Helmholtz free energy of the vacuum and one with sources J (at least when using real values of time).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top