What is the Fundamental Vector Product for Calculating Surface Area on a Sphere?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating Variables
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of the surface area of a sphere using integrals with two variables. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of parametric equations and spherical coordinates, while addressing misconceptions in the application of double integrals to curved surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially attempts to calculate the surface area of a sphere using a double integral, resulting in an incorrect area calculation that resembles that of a square lamina.
  • Another participant suggests that the correct approach involves finding the projection of the sphere on the xy-plane and evaluating the double integral over that region with appropriate limits.
  • A participant emphasizes that the integral form presented is for a rectangle in uv-space, not suitable for a curved surface, and highlights the importance of understanding the differential of area for such surfaces.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the polar angle's limits and the differential area element, with a participant noting that the differential is not simply dy.
  • One participant proposes using a parametric equation for the sphere and suggests taking partial derivatives to compute the cross product for the differential area.
  • Another participant introduces spherical coordinates as a method to express the surface area, detailing the fundamental vector product and its relation to the differential of surface area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for calculating the surface area of a sphere, with no consensus reached on a single correct approach. Multiple competing models and techniques are presented, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the initial approach, including incorrect assumptions about the nature of the integral and the need for proper differential elements when dealing with curved surfaces.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
I was trying my hand at integrals with 2 variables... So.. my first exercise was to find out the surface area of a sphere. So, the co-ordinate system is something like this:

i] The whole co-ordinate system is mapped on the surface of a sphere.
ii] The x-axis of the sphere is like the equator of the earth.
iii] The y-axis of the sphere is like the prime meredian of the earth.

So, for the area, I used:

[tex] A = \int^{2\pi r}_{0}dx\int^{2\pi r}_{0}dy[/tex]

giving me the area:

[tex] A = 4 \pi^2 r^2[/tex]

Which is ofcourse wrong.. because if i look from the first equation, it is more like I'm calculating the area of a square lamina having lengths [itex]2 \pi r[/itex] each.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rohanprabhu said:
Which is ofcourse wrong.. because if i look from the first equation, it is more like I'm calculating the area of a square lamina having lengths [itex]2 \pi r[/itex] each.
And that is exactly what you are doing. What you need to do, is figure out the equation of the projection of a sphere on the xy plane (imagine slicing a ball in half) and evaluate the double integral over that region (with correct limits).
 
Last edited:
rohanprabhu said:
I was trying my hand at integrals with 2 variables... So.. my first exercise was to find out the surface area of a sphere. So, the co-ordinate system is something like this:

i] The whole co-ordinate system is mapped on the surface of a sphere.
ii] The x-axis of the sphere is like the equator of the earth.
iii] The y-axis of the sphere is like the prime meredian of the earth.

So, for the area, I used:

[tex] A = \int^{2\pi r}_{0}dx\int^{2\pi r}_{0}dy[/tex]

giving me the area:

[tex] A = 4 \pi^2 r^2[/tex]

Which is ofcourse wrong.. because if i look from the first equation, it is more like I'm calculating the area of a square lamina having lengths [itex]2 \pi r[/itex] each.

The angle around the equator goes from 0 to 2pi. However, the polar angle goes from -pi/2 to pi/2 and even more important its differential is cosydy, not dy.
 
In general, the integral
[tex]\int_a^b\int_c^d du dv[/tex]
is the area of a rectangle in uv-space, not the surface of a sphere. For a problem like that, it is not enough to know how to do multiple integrals. You also have to know how to find the "differential of area" for a curved surface. The differential of area is "du dv" only for u and v being orthogonal coordinates in a plane.
 
mathman said:
The angle around the equator goes from 0 to 2pi. However, the polar angle goes from -pi/2 to pi/2 and even more important its differential is cosydy, not dy.

Thanks for replying. Can you please ellaborate on how the differential is cosy dy?
 
Here's a way to do it.
Lets take this surface and break it down.
First we require a parametric equation for a sphere--> [tex]a^2=x^2+z^2+y^2[/tex]
a is the radius of the sphere.
We can then turn this into a vector equation representing the parametric surface
[tex]\vec{r}=<x,y,(+/-)\sqrt(x^2+y^2-a^2)>[/tex]
We can then take partial derivatives with respect to x and y.
Then take the cross products of x with y, then the magnitude.
Basically:

[tex]\int\int|\vec{r}_x X\vec{r}_y|dxdy[/tex]
Change to polar for convenience.
 
Or, since this is a sphere, start from spherical coordinates:
[tex]x= \rho cos(\theta) sin(\phi)[/tex]
[tex]y= \rho sin(\theta) cos(\phi)[/tex]
[tex]z= \rho cos(\phi)[/itex]<br /> <br /> On the surface of the sphere of radius R, [itex]\rho= R[/itex] so we have<br /> [tex]x= R cos(\theta) sin(\phi)[/tex]<br /> [tex]y= R sin(\theta) cos(\phi)[/tex]<br /> [tex]z= R cos(\phi)[/itex]<br /> in terms of the two parameters [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\phi[/itex].<br /> <br /> Now, [itex]\vec{r}= R cos(\theta)sin(\phi)\vec{i}+ Rsin(\theta)\sin(\phi)\vec{j}+ R cos(\phi)\vec{k}[/itex]<br /> <br /> The cross product [itex]\left|\vec{r_\theta} \times \vec{r_\phi}\right|[/itex] is called the "fundamental vector product" of the surface and the "differential of surface area" is <br /> [itex]\left|\vec{r_\theta} \times \vec{r_\phi}\right|d\theta d\phi[/itex][/tex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K