I What Is the Geometrical Interpretation of Bounded Curves?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Curves
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,127
Reaction score
983
It is well known that a curve in ##\mathbb{R}^3## is uniquely (up to a position in the space) defined by its curvature ##\kappa(s)## and torsion ##\tau(s)##, here ##s## is the arc-length parameter. We will consider ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)\in C[0,\infty)##

Thus a natural problem arises: to restore features of the curve from given functions ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)##. This is not a simple problem: the Frenet-Serret equations are not in general integrable explicitly.A simplest property of the curve is boundedness. We shall say that a curve is bounded iff its radius-vector is bounded: $$\sup_{s\ge 0}|\boldsymbol r(s)|<\infty.$$

For example, if a function ##\kappa(s)/\tau(s)## is monotone and
$$\lim_{s\to\infty}\frac{\kappa(s)}{s\cdot\tau(s)}=0$$ then the curve is unbounded. This is an almost trivial fact, it follows from some another almost trivial theorem, for details see http://www.ma.utexas.edu/mp_arc/c/16/16-63.pdf

The comments are welcome. Particularly is there a geometrical interpretation of brought above proposition
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
wrobel said:
It is well known that a curve in ##\mathbb{R}^3## is uniquely (up to a position in the space) defined by its curvature ##\kappa(s)## and torsion ##\tau(s)##, here ##s## is the arc-length parameter. We will consider ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)\in C[0,\infty)##

Thus a natural problem arises: to restore features of the curve from given functions ##\kappa(s),\tau(s)##. This is not a simple problem: the Frenet-Serret equations are not in general integrable explicitly.A simplest property of the curve is boundedness. We shall say that a curve is bounded iff its radius-vector is bounded: $$\sup_{s\ge 0}|\boldsymbol r(s)|<\infty.$$

For example, if a function ##\kappa(s)/\tau(s)## is monotone and
$$\lim_{s\to\infty}\frac{\kappa(s)}{s\cdot\tau(s)}=0$$ then the curve is unbounded. This is an almost trivial fact, it follows from some another almost trivial theorem, for details see http://www.ma.utexas.edu/mp_arc/c/16/16-63.pdf

The comments are welcome. Particularly is there a geometrical interpretation of brought above proposition
I find it amazing. But will you explain me the restore features of curve. Actually I am going to read about curves in detail but I need little guidance. Can you name some of the books which I can buy.
 
I was saying that why you have used word bounded curves. Will you tell me its precise meaning.
 
Be more specific what you are saying
 
shina said:
was saying that why you have used word bounded curves. Will you tell me its precise meaning.
I have already done that
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
125
Views
19K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top