What is the Height of Mercury in an Inclined Torricellian Tube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rugile
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inclined Tube
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height of mercury in an inclined Torricellian tube, initially filled with mercury and then flipped. Participants clarify that the problem assumes the tube's bottom is immersed in mercury, which is crucial for determining the mercury column height when inclined. The relationship between pressure and height is emphasized, specifically Δp = ρgh, and the need to distinguish between height and length in the context of the tube's angle. The confusion about the pressure of air in the tube and the implications of the vacuum above the mercury is addressed. Ultimately, the goal is to find the dependency of the mercury column height on the angle of inclination.
Rugile
Messages
79
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A Torricellian tube (one end open, one end closed) of 1m length is filled completely with mercury and situated vertically the closed end down. Then the tube is flipped around 180 degrees and there is 760mm of mercury left. If we incline the tube at an angle \phi, what is the height of column of mercury in the tube? Find the dependency h(\phi), if when phi = 0 the tube is vertical, and when phi = 90 it is horizontal.

Homework Equations



p = \rho g h

The Attempt at a Solution



It is not said in the problem statement that the tube is emerged into a bowl of mercury, thus the height of the column when inclined can't stay 760mm. So I'm not really sure what happens when we rotate the tube - my guess is that some air goes through the mercury up to where Torricellian vacuum is supposed to be? If so, I have an equation (which is based on intuition only, can't really prove it) of equilibrium, but I don't really know if it is right: p_a = p_{\phi} + \rho g h_{\phi}; p_a = p_a sin\phi + \rho g h_{\phi}, pa is atmospheric pressure. It does make sense in a way, that when phi = 0, sin(phi) = 0 and pa = ρgh, and when phi = 90, then h = 0. But I'm unable to prove it with physics... Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not said in the problem statement that the tube is emerged into a bowl of mercury
You mean: It is not said in the problem statement that the bottom end of the tube is immersed into a bowl of mercury. But the exercise really wants you to make that assumption.

No air sneaking in either.

There is an analogy with communicating vessels (not identical, but Δp = ρgh in both cases). What happens when the third one from the left is tilted more and more (while remaining of the same length) ?

This Δp = ρgh is something you should take under thorough consideration: what does it mean, precisely. (note I already added a Δ).

Can't distill sense out of your equations. No idea what ##p_{\phi}## stands for.

(the way you tackle this made me think of an Einstein joke where the blackboard shows E = ma2 crossed out, mb2 crossed out too, and mc2 marked with a big eureka exclamation point. Sorry).

Imagine the tube is upright and has a huge diameter. Then think of a thin cylinder at an angle ##\phi##, well within the big tube. Thin cylinder is long enough to go from vacuum above to Hg bath at foot. Close top end of thin cylinder and let big tube drain. Would anything change for the thin tube ?By the way, I do find the exercise wording somewhat misleading: do they want the (average) length of the mercury column ? or the difference in height ?
 
Thank you for the answer. Well if you say it is safe to assume that the bottom of the tube is emerged in mercury, then I do know how to solve it :)

My equation had the idea that p(phi) is the pressure of air in the tube above mercury, if there is any air sneaking. As I said, it was completely unmotivated, just intuition (no hard feelings for the joke, it is funny!).

They want the length of mercury column in the tube. Not difference, just dependence of how high the column is depending on the inclined angle.
 
Problem is height is in the vertical direction, length can be along the tube. Up to you. As soon as the top of the tube is less than 760 mm above the liquid level, there is no more vacuum.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top