What is the Highest Safe Approach Speed for Uncontrolled Intersections?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lanzzdub
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Speed
AI Thread Summary
Determining the highest safe approach speed for uncontrolled intersections involves assessing visibility and stopping distances for vehicles. The speed limit on the road can serve as a baseline for safe speeds. In uncontrolled intersections, both vehicles must be able to see each other and stop to avoid collisions, which requires a margin of safety. For uncontrolled railroad crossings, California mandates a maximum speed of 15 mph if visibility is limited. Understanding these factors is crucial for safe navigation through such intersections.
Lanzzdub
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how'd you find out the highest safe approach speed when going through an intersection.

P.S. Could you please explain in detail.
Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
huh ?? :) safest approach and going through are a contradiction

maybe the speed limit that is set on that particular road would be a good place to start

what are you trying to get at/understand ?
maybe some more info from you about a particular situation etc ??

cheers
Dave
 
If it's an uncontrolled intersection with no stop signs (rare these days), then the safe speed is set based on two cars approaching intersection from different directions, being able to see each other and for both to be able to stop before a collision, plus some margin of safety.

In the case of an uncontrolled rail road crossing, if you can't see 400 feet in both directions while within 100 feet of the tracks, the speed limit in California is 15mph. I'm not sure of the maximum speed allowed for trains through such intersections, but it's probably between 50 and 70 mph. At 70 mph, the train travels 102 feet per second, so 400 feet would translate into about 4 seconds of reaction time.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top