What Is the Impact Speed of a Meteoroid Approaching Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MEwill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the impact speed of a meteoroid approaching Earth at a velocity of 1 km/s as it crosses the Moon's orbit. The user initially applies the wrong formula for gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, leading to confusion about the conservation of energy principles. It is clarified that the total mechanical energy should be conserved, with specific mechanical energy being a key concept. The correct approach involves calculating the specific mechanical energy at both the Moon's orbit and the Earth's surface, disregarding the meteoroid's mass since it cancels out in the equations. The conversation emphasizes understanding energy conservation to accurately determine the meteoroid's impact speed.
MEwill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Q: "Two meteoroids are heading for earth. Their speeds as they cross the moons orbit are 1km/s.
The first meteoroid is heading straight for earth, what is it's speed of impact?"

Velocity = 1km/s
Rearth = 6.37E6 m
Dmoon = 3.84E8 m
G = 6.673E-11 N*m^2/kg^2

Homework Equations


E = 1/2mv^{2} - √G*Mearth*m/r

The Attempt at a Solution


PE = (G * Mearth * m)/Dmoon
KE = -PE
1/2mv^{2} = -PE

From there can cancel the masses (lower-case m) of the meteoroid and solve for v. I don't feel like that is the right track. Shouldn't it be as the PE goes to 0? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MEwill said:

Homework Statement



Q: "Two meteoroids are heading for earth. Their speeds as they cross the moons orbit are 1km/s.
The first meteoroid is heading straight for earth, what is it's speed of impact?"

Velocity = 1km/s
Rearth = 6.37E6 m
Dmoon = 3.84E8 m
G = 6.673E-11 N*m^2/kg^2


Homework Equations


E = 1/2mv^{2} - √G*Mearth*m/r


The Attempt at a Solution


PE = (G * Mearth * m)/Dmoon
KE = -PE
1/2mv^{2} = -PE

From there can cancel the masses (lower-case m) of the meteoroid and solve for v. I don't feel like that is the right track. Shouldn't it be as the PE goes to 0? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

Hi MEwill, Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm not sure where you got the square root of G in the energy formula in your Relevant Equations, you might want to check that.

The standard zero reference for gravitational potential energy is taken to be at infinite distance, so PE will not be going to zero as the meteoroid approaches the planet's surface.

Instead, determine the total energy E at the given location (just crossing the Moon's orbit) and assume that that energy is conserved, so it's the same when it reaches the planet's surface.
 
The square root was a typo! I wasn't using it in my calculations. Figured it out I'm pretty sure. I wasn't adding the PE's. It should be the sum of the potential energy when crossing the moons orbit and the potential energy just before is reaches the Earth's surface (using radius of the earth) then set that = to the KE and solve for v? Just to make sure my logic is on the right track.
 
Not sure what you mean by "adding the PE's". You want to employ a conservation law, which in this case is conservation of mechanical energy (KE + PE = constant).

When the body in orbit is of insignificant mass with respect to the primary (here the Earth is the primary massive body) then you can work with what's called "specific" quantities. That's energy quantities given in "per unit mass" amounts. Essentially that means you just disregard the mass of the projectile when writing your conservation of energy equation. This is fine, since its mass always cancels out in the process of solving for the velocity anyways :smile:

In this problem you find what's known as the "specific mechanical energy" of the body and use the fact that this quantity is conserved:
$$\xi = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}$$
where ##\mu = G M##, and ##M## being the mass of the Earth.

##\xi## is conserved along the trajectory of the projectile (meteoroid). So write the expression for ##\xi## for the two locations of interest and set them equal...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top