What is the Inequality Used in Solving Probability Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hassman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of a specific inequality in solving a probability problem from "Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability." The author questions the validity of the inequality r > (1/(√2 - 1))b = (√2 + 1)b and explores the simplification process involved. Through multiplication by a form of one, the author clarifies that the transformation leads to a correct understanding of the problem. The conversation emphasizes how practice with such simplifications can make them intuitive over time. Overall, the exchange highlights the importance of recognizing and applying mathematical principles in probability problems.
hassman
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Tried to solve first problem in the book "Firfty Challenging Problems in Probability" and solved it although very ugly.

Then I check the answers and see the author use the following inequality:

r > \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b

Now correct me if I am wrong, but this implies that


<br /> <br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b<br /> <br />

Right? Well, this does not seem right, does it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Given: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b

Multiply by \frac{\sqrt{2}+1}{\sqrt{2}+1}

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}-1}*\frac{\sqrt{2}+1}{\sqrt{2}+1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b

\frac{\sqrt{2}+1}{2-1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b

\frac{\sqrt{2}+1}{1}b=(\sqrt{2} + 1)b
 
sweet mother of god. thanks.

It is always the 1 that is omitted that confuses me. Plus I used sqrt(9) to ease the calculation.
 
Sure, I just hope you understood the steps I took.

I'll lay it out in English just in case.

Basically you multiply top and bottom by the same thing (aka 1), then when you multiply the denominator, you'll remember that (x + A) (x - A) = x^2 - A^2. So for this we get 2 - 1 = 1 :)
 
yes I understood from the first reply, it's just so simple, hence my amazement.
 
Ah no worries. I wouldn't have thought to do this step either if this was me several years ago.

Once you see it the first time, it sticks to you. Once you practice it on a couple of problems it becomes natural. So whenever I see square roots like that in the denominator, I automatically turn on simplification mode (since I've seen it so many times).

Such is knowledge and life.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top