What is the kinematic conditions for free-surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinematic conditions for a free surface in the context of Rayleigh-Taylor instability. The key equation presented relates to the evolution of the surface elevation over time and its interaction with fluid velocity. It is clarified that for a free surface, the velocity vector must be tangent to the surface, meaning the normal component of velocity must be zero when the surface is stationary. However, if the free surface is moving, the normal components of both the fluid velocity and the surface velocity must be equal. Understanding these conditions is essential for analyzing fluid dynamics in scenarios involving free surfaces.
Chuck88
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
When I am studying the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, I saw this equation:

<br /> \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t} + u&#039; \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial x} = \omega &#039; (\eta)<br />

I do not quite understand the meaning of this equation. Can some one provide me with some instructions and information.

The detailed information of Rayleigh-Taylor instability is presented below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh-Taylor_instability
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Without trying to wade through the meaning of your equation (I don't know what your symbols mean, etc), the basic kinematic condition for a free surface is that the velocity vector must be tangent to the surface, or stated differently, the component of velocity normal to the free surface must be zero.
 
OldEngr63 said:
the basic kinematic condition for a free surface is that the velocity vector must be tangent to the surface, or stated differently, the component of velocity normal to the free surface must be zero.

That is only true is the free surface is not moving. The general condition is that the normal components of the fluid velocity and the free surface velocity are equal.
 
AlephZero is correct.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top