What Is the Kinetic Energy of the Bigger Mass After an Explosion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of the larger mass after an explosion involving a mass M that splits into two pieces. The smaller piece has mass M1 and speed V1, with its kinetic energy represented as K1=(1/2)M1V1^2. The kinetic energy of the larger mass can be expressed in relation to K1 as [M1/(M-M1)]K1. To find this, momentum conservation is crucial, as the total momentum remains zero after the explosion, allowing for the calculation of the larger mass's velocity and kinetic energy. Understanding these relationships is key to solving the problem effectively.
Victorzaroni
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An explosive of mass M is initially at rest. It then explodes into two pieces and travels along a straight line. The small piece has mass M1, speed V1, and kinetic energy K1=(1/2)M1V12. The kinetic energy of the bigger mass would be in terms of K1 would be:

Homework Equations



K=(1/2)mv2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to proceed without a mass ratio. The answer is [M1/(M-M1)]K1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If an object of mass M splits into two pieces, one of which has mass M1, then what is the mass of the other one? Doesn't this give you a mass ratio?
 
phyzguy said:
If an object of mass M splits into two pieces, one of which has mass M1, then what is the mass of the other one? Doesn't this give you a mass ratio?

Yes I figured that part out. So M-M1 is the mass of the other piece. I don't know how to factor this into an equation that relates the kinetic energy of the first piece.
 
Oh I think I understand why the answer is the answer. Dividing the small mass by the big mass gives you the ratio, and then multiplying this by the small pieces Kinetic Energy gives you the fraction of kinetic energy that the big piece has. I think. Now how do I put that in equation form to show that?
 
First you need to conserve momentum. Since the object is initially at rest, it has zero momentum. Since momentum is conserved, it still has zero total momentum after the explosion. Since you know the momentum of one piece, what is the momentum of the other piece? Once you've calculated its momentum, since you know its mass, you can calculate its velocity and then its kinetic energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top