What is the Limit of the abc-Formula as a approaches 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter suyver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limit of the quadratic formula as 'a' approaches zero in the equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0. It highlights that while one root converges to -c/b, the other root diverges to negative infinity, depending on the sign of b. The confusion arises from manipulating the expression involving a zero denominator, which is valid only under certain conditions. The analysis concludes that both roots behave differently as 'a' approaches zero, emphasizing the importance of considering the sign of b in determining the limits. Ultimately, the limit exists but requires careful case analysis to understand the behavior of each root.
suyver
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
I was wondering something that is so simple that it baffled me...

When I have the equation
a x^2+b x+c=0
this obviously has the solutions
x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

And when I have the equation
b x+c=0
this has the solution
x=\frac{-c}{b}

My problem now is the limiting case a\rightarrow 0 in the upper situation:
\lim_{a\rightarrow 0}\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\rightarrow -\infty\neq\frac{-c}{b}

So what's wrong here? Why does this limit not exist?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The limit does exist.

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\cdot \frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}=
\frac{b^2-(b^2-4ac)}{2a(-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which goes to \frac{-c}{b} when a goes to zero. The same goes for the other square root.
 
Last edited:
But for the other root, I get:

\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\cdot \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}=

\frac{b^2-(b^2-4ac)}{2a(-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which seems ok... but I don't think it is! After all, I multiply by

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which is 0/0 in the case when a\rightarrow 0, and that's not allowed

So I don't think you can do this:

x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \rightarrow \frac{2c}{-b\mp \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

Right?
 
Last edited:
One root goes to -c/b. The other root becomes infinite. Which is which depends on the sign of b, since the square root goes to |b| as a goes to 0.
 
OK, that makes sense. I had originally expected that both roots would converge to -c/b, but now that I think about it, it seems clear that the fact that b can be negative (so that I cannot just say \sqrt{b^2}=b) will spoil this. Oh well... too bad (for what I wanted).
 
suyver said:
After all, I multiply by

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which is 0/0 in the case when a\rightarrow 0, and that's not allowed

Well, since \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}
can only be zero when ac=0 this step is perfectly valid. We may assume a\neq 0 when calculating the limit. So that leaves c\neq 0 as a restriction. Although it would still be allowed when b is negative.

x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \rightarrow \frac{2c}{-b\mp \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}
Right?

This expression is correct, but you have to take cases. If b is positive, then you'll find the expression with the negative sign to converge to \frac{-c}{b}, if b is negative the expression with the positive sign converges to \frac{-c}{b}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top