What is the Limiting Velocity of an Electric Toy Car with Constant Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alice137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the limiting velocity of an electric toy car with constant power as time approaches infinity. Initial calculations suggest that velocity and acceleration both approach infinity, which seems unreasonable. Participants highlight that while mathematical results may indicate infinite values, physical constraints such as relativity limit the actual velocity of material objects. The conversation emphasizes the need to reconcile mathematical models with real-world physics, particularly regarding relativistic effects on mass and momentum. Ultimately, the conclusion suggests that the velocity should approach the speed of light, requiring a different relativistic approach for accurate modeling.
alice137
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



This problem concerns the mathematical treatment of a simple model
of an electric toy car of mass m, which is initially stationary. The bat-
teries in the car can be considered as an electrical power source with
constant power P.

Find the limiting value of the velocity at very large times and
comment on whether your result seems reasonable.

Homework Equations



On calculating I got v=sqrt(2Pt/m).

The Attempt at a Solution



As t -> Infinity, so does v-> Infinity. But that does not makes sense. Where am I wrong. Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Another part of the question was:

Find the limiting value of the acceleration at very large and very
small times and comment on whether your results seem reason-
able.

On calaulating I got a=sqrt(p/2mt).

As t -> 0, a -> Infinity. Again That doesn't makes sense.
 
alice137 said:
Find the limiting value of the velocity at very large times and
comment on whether your result seems reasonable.

But that does not makes sense. Where am I wrong

Hi alice! :smile:

What makes you think you're wrong?

The question obviously expects the answer not to be make sense.

You're asked to comment on why correct maths doesn't seem to agree with reality!

What do you think … ? :smile:
 
Well I personally believe that the answer for acceleration makes sense. Initially the car might have acquired some velocity in a small time. I think the high acceleration is plausible.

For velocity, it cannot increase without bounds as velocity of a material object is limited by Relativity. But if we see the time dependent relation of acceleration and see that as t-> infinity, a->0, which means that v-> some constant. But I cannot find that constant based on these arguments.
 
alice137 said:
For velocity, it cannot increase without bounds as velocity of a material object is limited by Relativity.

Hi alice! :smile:

At relativistic speeds, the mass m gets bigger, and the original formula is probably wrong also.
But if we see the time dependent relation of acceleration and see that as t-> infinity, a->0, which means that v-> some constant. But I cannot find that constant based on these arguments.

No, you're wrong - there's no problem there. a->0 does not have the same consequences as a = 0: there's no reason why v should -> constant.

√n -> ∞, but √(n+1) - √n -> 0 (for example, √1,000,001 - √1,000,000 ~ .0005). :smile:
 
What do you insist then; v should increase without bounds?
 
No, but the momentum can increase without bounds, even though v is always less than c. :smile:

(momentum = mv/√(1 - v^2/c^2).)
 
Then I suppose that the answer to the first question should be v-> c at very large times even although we cannot see it directly from the equation. I guess we need to derive another relativistic expression for very large times. Right! :smile:
 
Back
Top