What is the LJ cohesive energy expression for a 4-atom square configuration?

blueyellow

Homework Statement



i) Write down an expression for the LJ cohesive energy of a molecule consisting of four atoms lying on the corners of a square of side a.
ii) Deduce the equilibrium value of the nearest-neighbour separation, a, assuming the molecule retains its square shape
iii) What other configuration could the molecule adopt that would lower its LJ energy further?

Relevant equation:

U_{tot}=2N\epsilon[A_{12}(\frac{σ}{a})^{12}-A_{6}(\frac{σ}{a})^{6}]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done parts i) and ii). It is part iii) that I am stuck on. Because bcc, hcp and fcc all have higher N, number of atoms per unit cell, and higher values of A_{12}, making the cohesive energy higher - this is the case, isn't it? So what other configuration could the molecule adopt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


yes and no. you have to realize that U is a potential energy and therefore negative in nature. you have to do work to remove these molecules from their square setup into something else. in a simple cubic structure ( 2 sets of these squares make a simple cubic of 8 atoms), the cohesive energy between the molecules is stronger, and so the the potential U is more negative at the equilibrium position, making these bonds more stable.so yes N increases, and maybe even A12, A6 increase, but U is inherently negative making the cohesive energies stronger.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top