What is the lowest-frequency standing wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter neoking77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Standing wave Wave
AI Thread Summary
To determine the lowest-frequency standing wave with a node at the junction of a copper and aluminum wire, the tension and linear mass density (μ) of both materials must be considered. The user initially calculated the wavelength using the total length of the wire and derived the frequency from the wave speed equation. However, confusion arose regarding which material's density to use for calculating μ, as using aluminum's density did not yield the correct frequency. The correct approach involves calculating the linear mass density for both wires based on their respective densities and lengths, then finding the effective μ for the combined system. Ultimately, the solution requires careful consideration of the properties of both metals to accurately determine the standing wave characteristics.
neoking77
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 22-cm-long, 1.0-mm-diameter copper wire is joined smoothly to a 60-cm-long, 1.0-mm-diameter aluminum wire. The resulting wire is stretched with 20 N of tension between fixed supports 82 cm apart. The densities of copper and aluminum are 8920kg/m^3 and , 2700 kg/m^3 respectively.

a) What is the lowest-frequency standing wave for which there is a node at the junction between the two metals?

b) At that frequency, how many antinodes are on the aluminum wire?

Homework Equations


v = sqrt(T/mu)
v = lambda*f


The Attempt at a Solution


lambda = 2L
L = 0.82m
lambda = 1.64m

v = lambda*f
f = v / lambda
f = v / (1.64m)

v = sqrt(T/mu)
v = sqrt(20/mu)

d = mass / volume

mu = mass / length

ok...now the problem is, i dont' know which denstity (copper or aluminum) to use to figure out the mu. i tried using aluminum's since it's lower and hence will give the lower frequency, but it did not give the right answer. please help! thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help any 1 ?
 
I need help with this question too :/
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top