What is the Magnesium Activity in Springs Near Jenner with a pH of 9.5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skyblu280
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equilibrium concentration of magnesium in springs near Jenner with a pH of 9.5, specifically using the reaction Mg2+ + 2 OH- = Mg(OH)2. Participants are prompted to consider the dissociation constant of water to determine the activities of H+ and OH- ions in the solution. The solubility product for Mg(OH)2 is also relevant for these calculations. There is a mention of forum rules regarding homework help, indicating some participants are concerned about proper forum etiquette. The conversation ultimately aims to clarify the relationship between pH, ion activities, and magnesium solubility in the given context.
skyblu280
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Mg 2+ (aq) +2 OH- (aq)= Mg (OH)2 (s)


If I measure pH of springs near Jenner to be pH=9.5, what can you tell about the equilibrium activity (concentration) of magnesium in that solution? You need to calculate the dissociation constant of water.

Not sure how to start this? Any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you ignore homework template? In hope nobody will realize? I should delete your post and send you a warning about ignoring forum rules.

What is activity of H+ in the water?

What is activity of OH- in the water?

Now use solubility product for Mg(OH)2.
 
hi,

Sorry, I really thought I put this in the Hw section under the sciences...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top