What is the Magnetic Force on an Electron Moving Near a Current-Carrying Wire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cseil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic force on an electron moving near a current-carrying wire with a current of 48.8A. The magnetic field generated by the wire is determined to be 1.88x10^-4 T. For the electron moving perpendicularly to the wire, the force is directed parallel to the wire and in the same direction as the current. When the electron moves parallel to the wire, the force is directed radially inward towards the wire. The participants clarify the direction of the force using vector cross products, ultimately confirming their calculations and understanding.
cseil
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a straight wire through which passes a current of 48.8A.
There's an electron moving with velocity 1.08x10^7 m/s at distance 5.20cm from the wire.

I have to calculate the magnetic force on the electron when:
a) the velocity is directed perpendicularly to the wire
b) the velocity is directed parallel to the wire
c) the velocity is perpendicular to the other two directions (a,b)

Homework Equations


Biot-Savart's law
B = \frac{μ_0i}{2πr}

F = q\vec{v}× \vec{B}

The Attempt at a Solution


B generated by the wire is 1.88x10^-4 T

The direction of B is perpendicular to i and the vector \vec{d} (the distance between the wire and the electron). I considered the i going from left to right, so the vector B points inside the plane.

(a) Considering that, the force should be perpendicular to \vec{v} and \vec{B} so, with v directed to the wire, parallel to the wire but directed opposide to the current. The value is ok, I can calculate it, but I don't know if verse is right. My book says that the force is parallel and has the same verse of the current. I don't know why.

(b) If B points inside the plane, v is parallel to the wire, F points to the wire. It has the same value of (a).

(c) F is 0 because v is parallel to B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have done it well, but you are unsure about the signs.
To make sure about the direction of the force, set up the coordinate axes at the place of the electron, and determine the force vector from the vector product. ##\vec B = B \hat y## and ##\vec F = q \vec v \times \vec B##. If the electron moves perpendicularly to the wire and radially outward, ##\vec v = v \hat x##.
##\vec F = q \vec v \times \vec B= q v B \hat x\times \hat y= qvB \hat z## Note that the charge of the electron is -e. What is the direction of the force?
What is the direction if the electron moves radially inward ?
What is the direction of the force if the electron moves in the same direction as the current?

biotsavart.JPG
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the answer, I've understood!

The electon have a perpendicular direction and it is going towards the wire.
So ##\vec{v} = -v\hat{x}##
## \vec{B} = B\hat{y}##

##F = -qv\hat{x} \times B\hat{y} ##

So considering that q is -e, I have

## F = evB \hat{z} ##

The direction of the force is z, it is positive so in the case (a) the force is (as the book says) parallel to the wire and it has the same verse of the current.

So, case b.

I have ##\vec{v} = v\hat{z}##

## F = -ev\hat{z} \times B\hat{y} = -evB\hat{x} ##

The force is radial inward (direction x and opposite verse of the axis).

Is that right?
 
cseil said:
So, case b.

I have ##\vec{v} = v\hat{z}##

## F = -ev\hat{z} \times B\hat{y} = -evB\hat{x} ##

The force is radial inward (direction x and opposite verse of the axis).

Is that right?

No. ##\hat z \times \hat y = - \hat x. ## (remember: ##\hat x \times \hat y=\hat z ##, ##\hat y \times \hat z=\hat x ##, ##\hat z \times \hat x=\hat y ##, and changing the order, the product changes sign.
 
ehild said:
No. ##\hat z \times \hat y = - \hat x. ## (remember: ##\hat x \times \hat y=\hat z ##, ##\hat y \times \hat z=\hat x ##, ##\hat z \times \hat x=\hat y ##, and changing the order, the product changes sign.

Oh, right.
So same direction, opposite verse.

Thank you!
It is clear now! :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top