What is the magnitude and direction of the applied force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paymemoney
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude and direction of the applied force on a 1.25kg object that accelerates from 17.4 m/s to 26.8 m/s at an angle of 34 degrees over 3.41 seconds. The initial and final velocity components were analyzed, resulting in a horizontal component of 39.62 m/s and a vertical component derived from the sine of the angle. A calculation error was identified in determining the change in velocity, particularly in the vertical component, which starts at zero. The correct approach involves finding the change in both horizontal and vertical components separately. Ultimately, the force was calculated to be 16.65 N, but the user sought clarification on the vertical component's contribution to the overall force.
Paymemoney
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.25kg object is moving in the x direction at 17.4m/s. Just 3.41s later, it is moving at 26.8m/s at 34.0 degrees to the x-axis. What are the magnitude and direction of the force applied during this time?


Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly i drew a diagram and it was in vector components so i calculated the resultant.

1st component
H: 17.4m/s
V: 0m/s

2nd component
H: 26.8cos(34)
V: 26.8sin(34)

Resultant component:
Horizontal = 17.4 + 26.8cos(34) = 39.62 m/s
Vertical = 26.8sin(34)

so \sqrt{39.62^2+22.22^2}
direction Resultant = tan^{-1}(\frac{22.22}{39.62})

direction = 30 degrees

find the magnitude F = m * \frac{v}{t}

F = 1.25 * \frac{45.43}{3.41}
F=16.65N

This is incorrect can someone tell me where i have gone wrong.

P.S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Horizontal = 17.4 + 26.8cos(34) = 39.62 m/s
You have to find the change in horizontal component of velocity (vf - vi)
 
is this the same in the vertical component?

edit never mind its not the same
 
Last edited:
Paymemoney said:
is this the same in the vertical component?
Yes. But initial vertical component of the velocity is zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top