What is the Magnitude of the Electric Field Between Parallel Plates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field between two parallel plates with a given charge and separation. The key formula for the electric field due to one plate is E = sigma/(2 * epsilon), but the total electric field between the plates, where both fields add together, is E = sigma/epsilon. Participants clarify that the area of one plate is sufficient for calculating sigma, and the correct value for epsilon is 8.85E-12 F/m. A common misunderstanding is addressed regarding the factor of 2 in the denominator, which leads to confusion about whether to double the calculated field. Ultimately, the total electric field is found by doubling the value obtained from one plate's contribution.
badd99
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Two square metal plates are placed parallel to each other, separated by a distance d= 1.56 cm. The plates have sides of length L = 0.560 m. One of the plates has charge Q= + 1.74×10-6 C, while the other plate has charge -Q. Calculate the magnitude of the electric field between the plates, not close to the edge, i.e., assume a uniform surface charge distribution

Here's what I have so far: The electric field between them obviously isn't 0.

I've got sigma = (magnitude of charge)/area.
The electric field for one plate is E = sigma/(2 * epsilon).
Since the fields from both plates in between them point in the same direction, the total field would be E = sigma/epsilon. Would I use E=sigma/epsilon OR E=sigma/(2*epsilon) here for the correct answer?

epsilon is just 8.85 here not 8.85E-12 I am 99% but I don't really know why.

How in the WORLD do I find the area to find sigma though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
badd99 said:
The electric field for one plate is E = sigma/(2 * epsilon).
Since the fields from both plates in between them point in the same direction, the total field would be E = sigma/epsilon. Would I use E=sigma/epsilon OR E=sigma/(2*epsilon) here for the correct answer?
You want the total field, of course.

epsilon is just 8.85 here not 8.85E-12 I am 99% but I don't really know why.
You're wrong here: It's 8.85E-12.

How in the WORLD do I find the area to find sigma though?
The plates are square. Find the area.
 
Im still not getting it right...

I used 1.74×10-6 C as my charge and found the area of the one plate...do I need to find the total area (ie. add the two areas?)

I then got sigma using the above and plugged it into E= sigma / (2* epsilon)

I tried using 8.85 and 8.85E-12 and both incorrect.

Help?
 
badd99 said:
I used 1.74×10-6 C as my charge and found the area of the one plate...
Good. What did you get for the area.

do I need to find the total area (ie. add the two areas?)
No.

I then got sigma using the above and plugged it into E= sigma / (2* epsilon)
What did you get for sigma?

I tried using 8.85 and 8.85E-12 and both incorrect.
No point in plugging the wrong value.
 
area came out to: .3136 m^2
sigma came out to be: 5.548E-6

Plugged that into E = sigma / (2* epsilon) gave me: 313472.85 N/C and it was incorrect.
 
badd99 said:
Plugged that into E = sigma / (2* epsilon) gave me: 313472.85 N/C and it was incorrect.
You want the total field, not just that from one side. Double your answer.
 
I thought since we were doing 2*epsilon it was for both plates...aka total field.

I have the answer right now but don't really get why we had to double as I thought it was as stated above.

Thanks for the help!
 
badd99 said:
I thought since we were doing 2*epsilon it was for both plates...aka total field.
That factor of 2 is in the denominator, so that version is only half the field. (See my response in post #2.)
 
Thank you very much...I posted one more question if you don't mind.

Much appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top