What is the Mass of 3.5 Cubic Meters of Water at 25°C?

AI Thread Summary
The mass of water can be calculated using the known density of water, which is 1.0 kg per liter or 1.0 g per cm³ at 25°C. Since there are 1,000,000 cm³ in a cubic meter, 3.5 m³ equals 3.5 million cm³. Multiplying the volume by the mass of one cubic centimeter gives a total mass of 3,500 kg for 3.5 m³ of water. Dimensional analysis or conversion from cubic meters to cubic centimeters is suggested as methods for solving this problem. Understanding these conversions is essential for accurate calculations in physics and chemistry.
r-soy
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
One cubic centimeter (1.0 cm3) of water has a mass of 1.0 10-3 kg at 25°C. Determine the mass of 3.5 m3 of wa
One cubic centimeter (1.0 cm3) of water has a mass of 1.0 10-3 kg at 25°C. Determine the mass of 3.5 m3 of water at 25°C.



How i can solve this question ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Depending on where do you go to school, you are either expected to use dimensional analysis, or to find out how many cubic centimeters are in a cubic meter, then multiply.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top