What is the Mass of m4 Given Tensions and Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the unknown mass m4 in a system of four blocks on a frictionless surface under the influence of two forces and a known tension. The initial calculations yielded conflicting results for m4 based on different interpretations of the tension between blocks. The correct approach involves recognizing that the tension T3 is 36N, which affects the acceleration of the combined masses m1 and m2, leading to a consistent acceleration value. By applying Newton's second law to both sets of blocks, the final calculation confirms that m4 equals 4kg. The consensus is that the calculations align when the correct tension values and resultant forces are applied.
zaper
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I've worked through this problem a few different ways now and each one gives me different answers and I am looking for some guidance as to which is correct:

Four blocks of mass m1=1kg, m2=2kg, m3=3kg (very original right?), and unknown mass m4 are on a frictionless surface (pic attached). Force Fl pulls in the left direction at 30N and Fr to the right at 50N. The tension between m2 and m3 is 36N. What is m4?

As I worked through the problem I labeled all tensions as shown in the picture. I know T1=30N and T5=50N. My biggest problem arises from whether T3=36N or if 2*T3=36N.

The first time I did this problem I used 2*T3-36N or T3=18N. Then using Newton's 2nd law I set up the equations T2-T1=m1*a, T3-T2=m2*a, and so forth. Using this method I got that a=4m/s2 to the right and m4=5kg.

The second time I did this I used T3=36N and using the same equation setup as before I got a=2m/s2 to the left which seemed plausible, however using T5-T4=m4*a I ended up with m4=-10kg which seems not so plausible.

Any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • 4.4.png
    4.4.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 527
Physics news on Phys.org
T3 = 36N not 2x36N... it is pulling with 36N to the right on the combination (m1+m2) and pulling with 36N to the left on the combination (m3+m4)
You are given the tension between m2 and m3 to be 36N so (m1+m2) experience a resultant force to the right of what?... can you see that and calculate the acceleration of (m1 and m2).
Once you know the acceleration you can apply resultant force on (m3+m4) to calculate m4
 
So since m1+m2=3kg and the experience a force of 6N then a=2.

Then m3 and m4 experience 14N so

14=(m3+m4)*2 => 14=6+2*m4 => 8=2*m4 => 4kg=m4?

Is that right?
 
that is exactly what I got
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top