What Is the Maximum Acceleration That Keeps Both Suitcases Moving Together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CandyApples
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum acceleration at which two suitcases can move together without slipping. The bottom suitcase has a mass of 25 kg and the top one 15 kg, with coefficients of static and kinetic friction provided. The static friction force between the two suitcases is calculated to be 7.5 N, indicating that exceeding this force will cause them to accelerate together. The user struggles to find the correct equations to determine the maximum acceleration, initially calculating a very small value when applying F=ma. The conversation also explores the implications of doubling the pulling force and how it affects the motion of the top suitcase, raising questions about the dynamics involved when one suitcase begins to slip off the other.
CandyApples
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man is pulling two suitcases, one on top of the other. Bottom case mass=25kg and top mass = 15kg. The coefficient of friction between the two cases and between the bottom case and the floor can both be represented by Uk = .4 and Us =.5. Find the maximum acceleration of the cases so they move with respect to the floor, but not with respect to one another.

Homework Equations


F =un

The Attempt at a Solution


Fs = un for the two boxes.
Fs = .5*15
Fs = 7.5N.
This means exceeding 7.5N of force will cause the boxes to accelerate with one another. Now I need to plug this value into another equation such that I find the maximum acceleration of the two boxes. Using F=ma setting F equal to 7.5 does not work, as this gives an extremely tiny acceleration. I think another F=un is needed, but I am not sure how to set the second one up in a way that allows me to use the 7.5N I figured out before.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CandyApples said:

Homework Statement


A man is pulling two suitcases, one on top of the other. Bottom case mass=25kg and top mass = 15kg. The coefficient of friction between the two cases and between the bottom case and the floor can both be represented by Uk = .4 and Us =.5. Find the maximum acceleration of the cases so they move with respect to the floor, but not with respect to one another.


Homework Equations


F =un


The Attempt at a Solution


Fs = un for the two boxes.
Fs = .5*15
Fs = 7.5N.
This means exceeding 7.5N of force will cause the boxes to accelerate with one another. Now I need to plug this value into another equation such that I find the maximum acceleration of the two boxes. Using F=ma setting F equal to 7.5 does not work, as this gives an extremely tiny acceleration. I think another F=un is needed, but I am not sure how to set the second one up in a way that allows me to use the 7.5N I figured out before.

Is Fs the static friction in Fs = .5*15? What are the units of friction coefficient? Do dimension analysis for the equation: Fs = .5*15
 
Ok so now there is a part two to this problem.
I figured out Part I as follows:
Fs = .5 (147)
73.5 = 15*a
a = 4.9m/s/s

Fk = 392*.4
Fk = 156.8

F-156.8 = ma
F = 40(4.9)+157
F = 353N

Now it asks if F determined in Part I is doubled (706N) what will be the acceleration of each block. This will certainly result in the to suitcase flying off.

Plugging in 706 alone does not provide the correct answer. I think I need to account for the added information that the suitcase flies off, but I am not sure how. I forget exactly how to regard the top suitcase, as the course has not covered how to handle an object that is initially at rest then is put in motion by another object below it. If I recall correctly from a statics course taken some time ago, is the mass of the top box disregarded once it is put into motion? Also, hoe could I represent this? Does knowing that it takes 353N of force to put the top box into motion with respect to the bottom box allow me to derive an equation to figure out this problem?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top