What is the Maximum Angle for Total Internal Reflection in a Prism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xinlan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Prism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum angle for total internal reflection in a glass prism with a refractive index of 1.47, immersed in air. The initial attempt incorrectly used an air refractive index of 1.33 instead of the correct value of 1.00, leading to confusion about the angle alpha. Participants clarify that the angle calculated pertains to the incident ray's relationship with the normal at surface AC, not directly to alpha. To find alpha, one must subtract the angle of incidence from 90 degrees. A diagram is suggested to visualize the problem better and understand the relationships between the angles involved.
xinlan
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light is incident along the normal to face AB of a glass prism of refractive index 1.47

Find the alpha max, the largest value of the angle alpha such that no light is refracted out of the prism at face AC if the prism is immersed in air.

Homework Equations


n1*sin thetha1 = n2 * sin thetha2


The Attempt at a Solution


since no light is refracted out of the prism, then total internal reflection is involved.
sin critical alpha = (n2/n1)*sin 90
= 1.33/147
alpha = 64.8

but I got it wrong,
please someone help me..
thanks..
 

Attachments

  • yf_Figure_33_36.jpg
    yf_Figure_33_36.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 522
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you found is the angle that the incident ray makes with the normal to surface A-C. That's not alpha, but you can use it to find alpha.
 
I just got it..
I just realized that the n for air should be 1.00 not 1.33.
then to get the alpha --> 90 - the angle that the incident ray makes with the normal to surface A-C..

anyway.. thanks.. :)
 
xinlan said:
I just got it..
Good!
I just realized that the n for air should be 1.00 not 1.33.
D'oh! (I didn't even notice that. I must have been sleeping.)
then to get the alpha --> 90 - the angle that the incident ray makes with the normal to surface A-C..
Right.
 
can someone explain a little more abour this problem ... i do no understand why is necessary to use 90 ... i just got one answer but its wrong this is the feedbak ... You have given the angle between the light ray and the normal to the surface AB, not the angle for alpha
 
Last edited:
blue_shark said:
can someone explain a little more abour this problem ... i do no understand why is necessary to use 90 ... i just got one answer but its wrong this is the feedbak ... You have given the angle between the light ray and the normal to the surface AB, not the angle for alpha
What you gave, I presume, is the critical angle, which is not the angle alpha. You've got to use the critical angle to figure out alpha. Draw a clear diagram and look for the triangles.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top