What is the Metallic Oxide in This Stoichiometry Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UWMpanther
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a stoichiometry problem involving a metallic oxide. The problem states that 1.187 grams of a metallic oxide yields 1.054 grams of metal when reduced with hydrogen, and the goal is to identify the metallic oxide from given options. The correct answer is determined to be Cu2O, but participants express confusion about the calculation setup. The approach involves using molar masses to calculate moles for each potential oxide, with emphasis on the limiting reagent concept. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly setting up the stoichiometric calculations to arrive at the solution.
UWMpanther
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Stoichiometry Solving for unknow

Ok so this should be a simple, I know the answer from the key but need to know how to get to that answer.


Q: When 1.187g of a metallic oxide is reduced with excess hydrogen, 1.054 grams of the metal is produced. What is the metallic oxide?

A) Ag_2_O B)Cu_2_O C) K_2_O D) Tl_2_O

_x_ meaning subscript

I know the answer is B, but I cannont figure out where to start the problem.:mad:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, since the metal oxide is the limiting reagent, you can totally ignore the hydrogen.

You can go for trial and error, work out each of the moles through mass and Molar Mass by subbing Ag, Cu K and Tl.

Should be enough help for now, I hope.
 
THank you Invictious, but I'm still confused on the setup. Should it look something like:

Cu: 1.054g x 1/63.55 x this is where I get lost.
 
Ok I think I get it now:

setup for Cu would look like:
1.187 x 1/143.1 x 127.1/1
or would it be
1.187 x 1/143.1 x 2/1 x 63.55/1
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top