What is the missing number and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Equate
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying a missing number in a numerical puzzle. Participants analyze patterns in the sums of rows and columns, suggesting various potential solutions. One key observation is that the sums of the rows and columns must align, leading to the conclusion that the missing number could be 5 or 9 based on the odd/even distribution of numbers. Another participant proposes that the missing number could be 4, arguing that it maintains a 1:1 ratio between the frequency of column sums and row sums. The conversation highlights the complexity of the puzzle, indicating that multiple answers may exist depending on the interpretation of the patterns.
Equate
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
What's the missing number and why?

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/2408/a89raetsel.png​
[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
5 [and this just to submit the post, damn 4 characters! ]
 
drizzle said:
5 [and this just to submit the post, damn 4 characters! ]

why?
 
ƒ(x) said:
why?

21
23
25
27
 
I thought that too, but you beat me to it. You don't think there might be a pattern in the columns?
 
24 22 22 28 :biggrin:

hold on a sec!
 
1st sum [raw]= 1st sum [column]-3
2nd sum [raw]= 2nd sum [column]+1
3rd sum [raw]= 3rd sum [column]+3
4th sum [raw]= 4th sum [column]-1

so :rolleyes:
 
I guess that works. But this puzzle could have more than one answer. When you add all of the number up you get 91. So the ? could be a 9, making the total a perfect square :biggrin:
 
Another (and stupid) way to get 5:

Each row and column has two numbers that have 4 letters, hence the missing number must have 4 letters. Each row has an odd number of odd values, and each column has an even number of odd values. Hence, the missing number must be odd. The only choices being 5 or 9. Looking at the rows, no number is more than 3 away from its neighbors, hence, the number cannot be 9, and must be 5.

DaveE
 
  • #10
What about 4?

Look at the total for each column and each row.

Column 1: 24
Column 2: 23
Column 3: ?
Column 4: 27

Row 1: 21
Row 2: 23
Row 3: ?
Row 4: 27

If you use 4, that means the 3rd row is 24 and the 3rd column is 21. Therefore there is a 1:1 ratio of the frequency of column sums to row sums.

..right?
 
  • #11
revelations said:
What about 4?

Look at the total for each column and each row.

Column 1: 24
Column 2: 23
Column 3: ?
Column 4: 27
Row 1: 21
Row 2: 23
Row 3: ?
Row 4: 27

If you use 4, that means the 3rd row is 24 and the 3rd column is 21. Therefore there is a 1:1 ratio of the frequency of column sums to row sums.

..right?

check it :)
 
Back
Top