What is the missing variable in the double slit interference pattern?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a double slit interference pattern created by laser light of 517 nm. The bright bands are spaced 1.15 cm apart on a screen 87.5 cm away, with the third bright bands on either side of the central maximum missing. The user is confident in calculating the distance between the slits but seeks a methodical approach to determine the slit width. It is noted that the absence of certain bright bands is crucial for finding the slit width, as it indicates the relationship between the slit dimensions and the wavelength. Understanding this relationship is essential for solving the problem accurately.
CricK0es
Messages
54
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Laser light of wavelength 517 nm illuminates two identical slits, producing an interference pattern on a screen 87.5 cm from the slits. The bright bands are 1.15 cm apart, and the third bright bands on either side of the central maximum are missing in the pattern.

a.) Find the slit width, a
b.) Find the distance between their centres, d

Homework Equations



dsinθ = mλ

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly sure I can do b, it's just a bit of trig. But I'm wondering how one would find a. I understand the slit width has to be comparable to the wavelength for diffraction to occur, but I'm wondering if this question demands something a little more methodical.

Many thanks

-- Yeah I got 3.93x10^(-5)m for d and that is correct [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CricK0es said:
and the third bright bands on either side of the central maximum are missing in the pattern.
You'll have to figure out what that means, it will lead to the slit width.
 
  • Like
Likes CricK0es
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top