What is the Mistake in Finding the Critical Point for f(x,y)=xy+(144/x)+(12/y)?

MathNoob123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f(x,y)=xy+(144/x)+(12/y)
f has a relative minimum at ( , , )

Homework Equations



Partial derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution


fx=y-(144/x^2)
fy=x-(12/y^2)

I setted these to zero. Multiplies both sides so there is no fraction.

Came out to be something like~~~ x2y-144=0
xy2-12=0

then did the factoring stuff and got

x2-12xy2=0

This tells me that the critical point is (0,0), but this is the wrong answer.

PLEASE TELL ME WHAT I AM DOING WRONG.

THANK YOU SO MUCH TO THOSE WHO HELP. THIS FORUM IS HELPING ME BECOME A BETTER MATHMATICIAN AND THEREFORE, MY TEST GRADES ARE GOING UP. THANK YOU.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your partial derivatives and general procedure are correct:smile:; but your attempt to solve for x and y is very confusing...try solving the f_y=0 equation for x, and substitute that result into your f_x=0 equation and solve for y...
 
just to add - there can be (and is in this case) more than one stationary point

as you mentioned (0,0) is a stationary point, but that doesn't automatically make it an extremum - need to look at the 2nd order partial dervatievs to determine that
Edit - (0,0) is not a critical point
 
Last edited:
(0, 0) most certainly is NOT a stationary point- it's not even a point on the graph. f is not defined at (0,0).
And I get only one critical point.
 
yeah - looked at that a little too quickly, sorry for the mis-steer
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top