What Is the Molarity of 70% TBHP Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amorale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molarity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molarity of a 70% TBHP solution, using its density of 0.937 g/mL and a formula weight of 90.12 g/mol. The initial calculation yielded a molarity of 10.4M, but confusion arose regarding the interpretation of the 70% concentration. It was clarified that "molarity of 70%" refers to a weight/weight percentage, leading to a revised calculation of 7.28 mol/L. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the context of the percentage in relation to molarity. The final consensus indicates that the correct molarity for the 70% TBHP solution is indeed 7.28 mol/L.
amorale
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the Molarity of 70% TBHP?


Homework Equations


Given: d=.937g/ml, FW=90.12g , w/w%?


The Attempt at a Solution


1000mL x (0.937g/mL) x (1mol/90.12g) = 10.4M

That is what I got but idk what to do with the 70% or that w/w%
or is that right the way I did it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Molarity of 70%" means .7 times one molarity. Do you know what a one molarity solution would be?
 
So this is what I came up with now:

1000mL x (0.937g/mL) x (.7) x (1mol/90.12g) = 7.28mol/L

Is this correct now?
 
If they are asking the molarity and they have given you density, then it is definitely w/w%
 
HallsofIvy said:
"Molarity of 70%" means .7 times one molarity.

No, in this context it means molarity of 70% solution of TBHP, 70% being most likely w/w.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top