What is the moment of inertia for a rotating disk with a hanging mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia (I) for a rotating disk with a hanging mass. The problem involves a 30-gram mass pulling down on a disk with a radius of 20 cm, and the mass falls 1 meter in 2 seconds. Initial calculations led to confusion over the correct formulas for acceleration and velocity, with participants clarifying that the correct approach involves using s = vi*t + 1/2a*t^2 to find acceleration. After correcting the calculations, the moment of inertia was determined to be approximately 0.0235 kg.m^2, contingent on the disk's axis being horizontal. The discussion highlights the importance of using the right equations for accurate results in physics problems.
mr_joshua
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This problem is giving me a headache.

A disk is free to rotate about its center(frictionless) in a vertical axis. A mass m=30grams, pulls down on the disk by means of a light string that is wrapped around the disk. If the radius is 20 cm, Find "I" if the mass falls 1 meter in 2 sec.

We used rT=I(a/r)

so you get .2(.03*9.8)=I(.25/.2)

found velocity using v=s/t

and acceleration using a=v/t

Is this correct? the value for inertia I get is .045 kg m/sec^2

the book has .0222 kg m/s^2
Help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a little confusing ? Is the axis of the disc vertical or horizontal. If it really is vertical, I can't see how exactly the mass hangs off the edge.

If it is horizontal, then the approach you use is correct except for your calculation of the acceleration (a) of the mass.

You say, v = s/t and a = v/t . This is incorrect. The first expression gives you the average velocity while the second relies on the final velocity.

What is the correct equation for finding 'a' given s, t ? Of course, the initial velocity, u = 0. If you make this correction (using the right equation) you will find that you get I = 0.022 kg.m^2 (not kg.m/s^2, which is the unit of force)
 
using wrong formula for accel and velocity?

I am using v=s/t to get .5 m/s

then using vf^2=Vi^2 + 2*a*s

to get .125 m/s^2...?
using this we divide by the radius of .2 to get angular accel. of .625rad/s^2

I am not seeing something.

Thanks again for all your help
 
oops again

sorry, now I believe that I am using the right formula,,,

s=vi*t+1/2a*t^2

to get a=.5
Ang a= 2.5

then I get I=.0235?
 
Yup, that's it. But you're right...it's 0.0235. Now I wonder why that little difference is there ? I'm not sure...but it looks okay, as long as the axis IS HORIZONTAL ! :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top