What is the moment of inertia of a cone spinning about its symmetry axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a uniform cone spinning about its symmetry axis. The initial attempt involved using the integral I = ∫R^2dm, but the approach was critiqued for not properly accounting for the varying radius of the disks formed by slicing the cone. A suggestion was made to use the known moment of inertia of a disk and integrate it across the height of the cone for a more straightforward solution. Emphasis was placed on clearly documenting reasoning at each step to facilitate understanding and assessment. The correct moment of inertia for the cone is ultimately determined to be (3/10)MR^2.
oliveyew1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the moment of inertia and center of mass of:
A uniform cone of mass M, height h, and
base radius R, spinning about its symmetry
(x) axis.

Homework Equations



I = ∫R^2dm

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using I =∫R^2dm, solving for dm I got dm=(M/V)dV, with dV = piR^2*dx. Thus, ∫R^2*(M/V)piR^2*dx V = 1/3*piR^2*h, so ∫R^2*M*(1/(1/3*piR^2*h))piR^2dx. Pi and R^2 cancel, so ∫3(M/h^3)R^2x^2dx, which gets me MR^2, and the right answer is (3/10)MR^2

Homework Statement

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is that r is the perpendicular distance from the rotation axis of a small mass dm ... the moment of inertia of that mass is r2dm ... and you add up all the wee masses. It looks to me that you may have attempted to use a method intended for a point mass on a cylindrical one.

You appear to have adopted the strategy of slicing the cone into disks with x being the rotational axis. So the disks have thickness ##dx## and area ##\pi r^2 ## did you realize that the radius of the disk at x s a function of x?

You have a better shortcut though - you already know the moment of inertia of a disk ;) So why not just add them up? $$I=\int_0^h I_{disk}(x)dx$$

The best way to handle these is to write down you reasoning at each step - in words.
Avoids the need for this kind of guesswork on the part of people checking and/or marking your work ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top