What is the Moment of Inertia of a Disk with a Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArticMage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia (MI) of a modified circular disk with a hole. The initial mass of the disk is 350 g, and after cutting out a hole, the mass is adjusted to 328.125 g. The moment of inertia for the whole disk is calculated using the formula 0.5 * M * R^2, resulting in 214375 g*cm^2. The user initially misapplied the parallel axis theorem and incorrectly subtracted the MI of the hole without considering its position relative to the center of the disk. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating the MI of the whole disk and then subtracting the MI of the hole, taking into account its distance from the center.
ArticMage
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform circular disk has radius 35 cm and mass 350 g and its center is at the origin. Then a circular hole of radius 8.75 cm is cut out of it. The center of the hole is a distance 13.125 cm from the center of the disk. Find the moment of inertia of the modified disk about the Z-axis.


So first the mass of the circle with the hole is 328.125 g and the small circle is 21.875g . Then what I did was first found the MI of the disk without the hole.

.5*M*R^2=214375 g*cm^2

Then I tried finding the cm after the hole was made and used the parallel axis theorem.

The cm is (-.875cm,0) so the -.875 becomes the distance from the original cm and then

214375 + M(-.875)2=214626 which isn't right

Then I tried the MI of the whole disk - the MI of the hole which also was wrong.

So if anyone can help that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is
MI of the whole disk about z axis - the MI of the hole (disk) about z axis.
 
Ok I see what I did wrong.

I did it MI(whole)-MI(small) but the MI(small) was just the MI of the removed piece itself, not as part of the whole. This makes sense, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top