What is the net charge on the hollow conducting sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the net charge on a hollow conducting sphere given specific electric field measurements at various distances. The user has already calculated the charge on the insulating sphere and the surface charge on the inside of the hollow sphere. To find the net charge on the hollow conducting sphere, it is suggested to use Gauss's law and consider the total charge within a Gaussian surface that includes both the insulator and conductor. By subtracting the charge of the insulator from the total charge, the charge on the conductor can be determined. The user expresses appreciation for the clarification and feels confident about their upcoming exam.
mitleid
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
For the configuration shown in the figure below, suppose that a = 5.60 cm, b = 19.8 cm, and c = 27.9 cm. Furthermore, suppose that the electric field at a point 13.7 cm from the center is 3.44 x 10^3 N/C radially inward, while the electric field at a point 47.0 cm from the center is 1.03 x 10^2 N/C radially outward.

diagram-2.jpg


I've already answered half of this question, which is to find the charge on the insulating sphere as well as the surface charge on the inside of the hollow sphere (-7.18 x 10^-9 C and 7.18 x 10^-9 C respectively).

I'm having trouble with these :
find (b) the net charge on the hollow conducting sphere. and

(d) the total charge on the outer surfaces of the hollow conducting sphere.

What I did to try and get the net charge was basically the same as what I did for the insulating sphere...

(Field * R^2)/Ke = q

Any help is much appreciated! Pretty interesting problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: First find the net charge within a gaussian sphere containing both the insulator and the hollow conductor...

Then subtract away the charge on the insulator to give the charge on the conductor... use the field at 47.0cm that they've given...
 
Last edited:
yes!

I think I've got it now, thanks for connecting the dots for me... I'm actually a fairly visual learner, so until the picture makes sense in my mind it's difficult to realize the necessary calculations.

I should be doing well on the exam next week! Thanks again.

~Mitleid
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top