What is the net magnetic field at a point due to perpendicular currents?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the net magnetic field at point P due to two perpendicular currents, one must consider the direction of the magnetic fields generated by each wire. The wire carrying a 7.00 A current along the x-axis produces a magnetic field in the +z direction, while the 6.00 A current along the y-axis creates a field in the -z direction. The net magnetic field can be calculated by adding these two vectors, taking care to account for their signs. The correct formula for the net magnetic field is Bnet = Bx - By, where Bx is the field from the x-axis wire and By is from the y-axis wire. Understanding the direction of each magnetic field is crucial for accurate calculations.
thebigbluedeamon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I cannot figure how this works..

A wire carries a 7.00 A current along the x-axis and another wire carries a 6.00 A current along the y-axis. What is the magnetic field at point p located at x=4.00m and y=3.00m.

Since each wire carries its own magnetic field, my instinct is saying that I just need to add the magnitude of the two fields. But that doesn't seem correct.

A speedy reply would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thebigbluedeamon said:
Since each wire carries its own magnetic field, my instinct is saying that I just need to add the magnitude of the two fields. But that doesn't seem correct.
That's all there is to it. Be sure you have the correct sign (direction) of each field when you add them.
 
So would the direction of the field in the y-direction be negative and the direction in the x-direction be positive?

I guess I would end up with something like...

Bnet = Bx - By

Sounds easy enough for me.
 
thebigbluedeamon said:
So would the direction of the field in the y-direction be negative and the direction in the x-direction be positive?
The current along the y-axis creates a field (at the point in question) that is in the -z direction; the current along the x-axis creates a field in the +z direction.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top