- 20,642
- 27,821
After Thor's døgn, after Wodan's døgn, after Tyr's døgn. We all should replace all the eagles in our state signs by ravens!WWGD said:After Thursdiya?
After Thor's døgn, after Wodan's døgn, after Tyr's døgn. We all should replace all the eagles in our state signs by ravens!WWGD said:After Thursdiya?
Yes, what's up with those eagles? The U.S, Mexico, Germany, all have them in their respective flags. Weird that they had a gov official with name Eagleburger, when it is prohibited to kill --and therefore eat eagles.fresh_42 said:After Thor's døgn, after Wodan's døgn, after Tyr's døgn. We all should replace all the eagles in our state signs by ravens!
... and Russia, and Austria, and Poland ... Strong eagles rather than smart ravens - telling, isn't it?WWGD said:Yes, what's up with those eagles? The U.S, Mexico, Germany, all have them in their respective flags. Weird that they had a gov official with name Eagleburger, when it is prohibited to kill --and therefore eat eagles.
Not surprising.skyshrimp said:are a cannibalistic
Lol, I guess that works... .skyshrimp said:...female women...
I knew a network administrator who hanged a dozen of them on the wall behind his desk ... - without the clock, of course.BillTre said:
Contractible? You mean the laundry in my appartment -- up to homotopy?fresh_42 said:Could have been even worse: Imagine the round trip was 0-homotope!
Yep. Would be a nice come an go then.WWGD said:Contractible? You mean the laundry in my place -- up to homotopy?
Yes, it would be nice to live in a loop space, which is where I think every thing is true when considered up to homotopy. Or maybe some length space. I don't know enough to identify things better here.fresh_42 said:Yep. Would be a nice come an go then.
Not that I haven't tried those kind of embeddings. The fine art is to do it isometric!WWGD said:Still, sometimes I have thought of Topological analogies , as in finding one way in life being a way of finding an embedding into life.
Thank you so much. I can't stop crying.Tom.G said:
WWGD said:Path-connectedness is not just an empty abstraction. I paid extra rent on the grounds that there was a laundry inside the building where I live. BUT... there is no path _inside of the building_ taking me from my apt. to the laundry room. So I must exit the building in order to go to the laundry room. I counted, and, in order to : drop the clothes on the laundry, go back up to wait till they're done, go back down to put them in the laundry, go back up to wait till they're dry, go back down to pick them up, go back up, I must use my key 10 times -- at times while carrying clothes. If someone tries to sell you on this, on having laundry inside of the building, do ask whether there is a path between your apt. and the laundry _within_ the building. EDIT ALTHOUGH: having a path between the apt. and the laundry room within the building is weaker than overall path-connectedness. AND there are no chairs in the laundry room -- barely any space to walk in there.
Good idea, thanks. It may be more worthwhile to go to an outside place to do the laundry, where at least they have a sitting area, tho most likely not Wifi. I doubt anyone iis likely to steal my clothes, since they are all at least 10 years old.StoneTemplePython said:From the one apartment I've had that did not have onsite laundry, I've learned that you can get a laundry-bag-backpack from Amazon for under 20 bucks. Very helpful for freeing up your hands while carrying clothes.
edit:
ixnay on the bi-partite graph
Caller ID spoofingWWGD said:I just missed this call at around 11 today. I call back...and the number is out of service!?? How can I receive a call from a number that is out of service??
WWGD said:I just missed this call at around 11 today. I call back...and the number is out of service!?? How can I receive a call from a number that is out of service??
uh oh. You're on their list. Plan on five or six a day forever. Blocking does no good they just call back with a different fake number. Press "1" and waste their time it's your only revenge.WWGD said:I just missed this call at around 11 today. I call back...and the number is out of service!?? How can I receive a call from a number that is out of service??
Much more fun would be to find out who the organiser works for (eg their boss or the CEO) and nominate that person.WWGD said:They had this contest asking people to nominate someone they considered to be a hero. I am thinking of nominating myself, not because I think I am a hero, but just to think of the reaction the organizers will have to such a pretentious gesture.
Form the habit of flashing a smile and friendly 'hi' upon eye contact. They'll think you're a Southerner. "Howdy" is even better.WWGD said:I have caught a nasty habit of staring at people directly. Not on purpose, just in a distracted way, but I can see how it is annoying to be at the receiving end of it.
Evo said:My dog Ming passed away today, it was sudden and unexpected
Evo said:I'm crushed. My heart is ripped out.
... and won with his pawns! And what did Mamedjarow: lost, too, completely unnecessarily. What a day.fresh_42 said:Karjakin has given the quality for nothing...
I sure hope you don't have to start selling the morning paper... like Jimmy did. .WWGD said:My jacket is wearing out and some feathers are showing in the outside layer.
Should be an easy win - ostriches don't have fists.WWGD said:I got into a fist fight with an ostrich.
EDIT :No kidding.My kind of fight!Ibix said:Should be an easy win - ostriches don't have fists.
That's the problem of trying a joke with the science crowd; they fact-check you when you try to use some license :) . I remember once I told the joke that the Vatican's logicians were working over time after the pope said: " I am sorry, I was wrong before -- I actually _am_ infallible" , and someone (seriously) gave me a pretty full argument for EDITwhy the Pope making a mistake did not contradict the doctrine of infallibility. Serenity Now!Ibix said:Should be an easy win - ostriches don't have fists.
I always assumed that's where papal bull came in, but perhaps I misunderstand the terminology.WWGD said:I remember once I told the joke that the Vatican's logicians were working over time after the pope said: " I am sorry, I was wrong before -- I actually _am_ infallible"
Doesn't surprise me - you can't swing a cat round here without hitting an expert on something random like dealing with cat scratches to the head.WWGD said:someone (seriously) gave me a pretty full argument for why infallibility did not contradict the doctrine of infallibility.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_Scratch_FeverIbix said:I always assumed that's where papal bull came in, but perhaps I misunderstand the terminology.
Doesn't surprise me - you can't swing a cat round here without hitting an expert on something random like dealing with cat scratches to the head.