What is the Norton Equivalent Resistance for This Circuit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Norton equivalent resistance for a specific electrical circuit. Participants explore different methods and reasoning for calculating the equivalent resistance, addressing potential misunderstandings and visualizing circuit connections.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the Norton equivalent resistance involves combining the 3-ohm and 2-ohm resistors in parallel with the 4-ohm resistor, but arrives at a different answer than expected.
  • Another participant clarifies that the 6-ohm resistor is connected to the node between the 3-ohm and 2-ohm resistors, indicating that the 3-ohm and 6-ohm resistors are actually in parallel.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the role of the 2-ohm and 4-ohm resistors in the calculation process.
  • One participant explains a method for visualizing the circuit layout to simplify the calculation of total resistance.
  • Another participant acknowledges that the combination of the 6-ohm and 3-ohm resistors results in a 2-ohm equivalent, but emphasizes that this does not account for all resistors in the circuit.
  • A later reply confirms the visual representation provided by another participant, leading to a clearer understanding of the circuit configuration and the calculation of Norton resistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to calculating the Norton equivalent resistance, with no consensus reached on the final answer. Some participants agree on the need for a clearer visualization of the circuit, while others remain uncertain about the role of specific resistors.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various techniques for calculating equivalent resistance, but there are unresolved assumptions about circuit connections and the impact of different resistor configurations on the final answer.

exis
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble finding the norton equivalent resistance for the attached circuit.

I reasoned that once you short the source, you just get the (3ohm+2ohm) in parallel with the 4ohm resistor.

However the answer I'm getting is not the one given in the book (I get 2.22ohms, when it should be 2ohms). Apparently the 3ohm and the 6ohm resistor are in parallel, I just can't see how. If anyone can guide me through it, you would be doing me a huge favor!

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • rnorton.jpg
    rnorton.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
The 3-ohm+2-ohm combo isn't in parallel with the 4-ohm resistor because the 6-ohm resistor is connected to the node in between the 3-ohm and 2-ohm resistors.

When you short the source, you can drag the top end of the 6-ohm resistor all the way around the loop and down to the bottom, and you'll see that it and the 3-ohm resistor are in parallel.
 
Fair enough. However I still don't get why the 2ohm and 4ohm resistor are not taken in consideration
 
What do you mean?
 
Well, usually to calculate the thevenin/norton resistance the load is replaced by an open circuit and the source by a short circuit. then i imagine a current entering the circuit from one of the terminals where the load was connected. using this technique, I can't get the correct answer, that is, R_norton = 2ohms
 
Oh, I think I understand what you meant. The 6-ohm and 3-ohm resistors combine to give you a 2-ohm resistor, but the fact that the answer to the problem is 2 ohms is just a coincidence. You still have to include the other resistors to get to the final answer.
 
My guess, is that you're having a hard time visualizing the circuit. Here's a little trick that helps me see simplify the layout:

Starting with the power supply shorted out and the load resistor R removed (open), you have the following:

N1.png



Next, arbitrarily label the ends of each resistor with an "A" on one end and a "B" on the other. Also, label the points between which you are trying to find the total resistance (in this case, the ends where the load resistor used to be attached) as "1" and "2"

N2.png



Now, it's a matter of redrawing the circuit starting with point "1" top and ending with point "2" at the bottom. First, draw point "1" at the top with a line extending out of the bottom. Referring to the last drawing (the original), determine which resistors are connected directly to point 1 ... in this case, the 6-, 3-, and 4-ohm resistors are all connected directly to point 1. So draw 3 branches pointing downward from the line you already drew from the bottom of point 1. Draw one of each of the 3 resistors you located at the bottom of each branch. Now (here's the key), label the top of each of those resistors with the same label as the end of the resistor that connects directly with point 1 (from the original drawing). Label the bottoms of each resistor with the opposite label. Now pick one of the 3 resistors and start from the bottom (open end). Look at the label and find the same end of that resistor in the original drawing ... how many resistors (and/or endpoints) does it connect to? And, to which end (what labels)? Make connections and add branches accordingly. Continue the process until both ends of all resistors have been connected and point 2 has been reached.

Here's how my example came out:

N3a.png



It should now be much easier to do your calculations.
 
zgozvrm, thank you. that was exactly what I was having trouble with. the way you drew it makes it very clear. ((6||3) + 2) || 4 = 2ohms = Rnorton

Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this
 
Glad to help!

I don't know how they're teaching this stuff nowadays, but when I was in school, they didn't give you any good techniques for visualizing circuit topology. Eventually, I came up with this system and I use it quite often (especially when teaching others how to simplify resistor circuits).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K