What is the notation [itex]id_{ }[/itex]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter operationsres
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
operationsres
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Preface: Can't understand notation from 1st year Real Analysis textbook that they pulled out of thin air without defining.

1. The thing statement that they're proving
Let A and B be sets. Moreover, let f : A \rightarrow B be some injective map. Calculate f^{-1} \circ f.

SOLUTION: To every y \in f(A), the map f^{-1} associates the corresponding x \in A which satisfies f(x) = y. In particular, it associates with f(x) the element x for all x \in A. Hence:

f^{-1} \circ f = id_A, f \circ f^{-1} = id_{f(A)},

where for every set C the corresponding map id_C : C \rightarrow C is defined by:

id_C (x) := C

for all x \in C.


2. My confusion
What's id?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The identity map- the function that maps every member of a set to itself. If you are taking "mathematical analysis" surely you have seen inverse functions before? And you should know that the definition of "inverse function" is that f-1(f(x))= f(f-1(x))= x?

But I doubt that your text says "idC(x):= C". Surely it says "idC(x)= x for all x\in C". Check that again.
 
1) It does say what you supposed that it did not say. Must be a typo.

Page 31 of Beyer's Calculus & Analysis: A combined approach.

2) You've solve my problem. Thanks :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top