What is the odd inequality sign I saw in my lecture notes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Sign
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I saw this rather odd symbol of the the greater sign on top of the less sign in my lecture notes. I am wondering if there is a name for this symbol and if signifies 'equal to' as well?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
<
>
?

I would interpret that as "is not equal to".
 
Is it any of these?

\lessgtr, \quad<br /> \gtrless,\quad<br /> \lesseqgtr,\quad<br /> \gtreqless,\quad<br /> \lesseqqgtr,\quad<br /> \gtreqqless
 
Dr. Seafood said:
Is it any of these?

\lessgtr, \quad<br /> \gtrless,\quad<br /> \lesseqgtr,\quad<br /> \gtreqless,\quad<br /> \lesseqqgtr,\quad<br /> \gtreqqless

I'd say it'd probably be the second one.
 
Again, my best guess is "is not equal to".
 
It's an abbreviation of < or >, the alternatives being explained or elaborated on nearby.

You could write: a≶b≶c, which means that either a<b<c or a>b>c.
Or you could write something like: |x|=±x if x≷0.
The upper level is one case, the lower level is the other case.

It is rarely used. Different cases are usually put on different lines with braced conditions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top