What is the optimal package volume for UPS?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the optimal package volume for UPS, given specific constraints on dimensions. The original poster outlines the conditions that UPS imposes on package size, including maximum length and girth, and describes a package with a square front face.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of equations for volume and constraints, with attempts to express one variable in terms of another. Questions arise regarding the rationale for setting specific equations, particularly the relationship between dimensions and the maximum allowable girth.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants providing corrections and prompting further reflection on the assumptions made in the equations. Multiple interpretations of the optimal conditions are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints set by UPS, including maximum dimensions and the implications of reaching those limits. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations and the need for careful consideration of the relationships between variables.

bowniski
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



UPS will only accept packages with a length of no more than 108 inches and length plus girth of no more than 165 inches. Assumign that the front face of the package is square, what is the largest volume package that UPS will accept?

Assuming the package looks like this,
http://imgur.com/4FeLW

Homework Equations



Girth = perimeter of the face (4x)

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I got these two equations:

Volume: V = (x2)(y)
y \leq 108
y + 4x \leq 165

How do I solve this from here? I tried to solve for X by moving 4x to the other side, then setting them equal but it didnt seem to work!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Next step is to change the second line to y + 4x = 165 (together with the obvious constraint 0 =< 4x =< 165).
 
Outlined said:
Next step is to change the second line to y + 4x = 165 (together with the obvious constraint 0 =< 4x =< 165).

Thanks for the reply!

Okay, why do you assume that y+4x = 165? Is it because that's the highest value possible?

In any case, if I do that:

y+4x = 165
y = 165-4x

v = (x^2)(165-4x)
v = 165x^2 - 4x^3
v' = -12x^2 + 165x

Did I do this right? If so, should I just find the maximum of v' and that would be my answer for x?

With that, the maximum is 55/8 = x
 
there is an error in v', you missed 2 * 165

Think yourself about why it is smart to put y + 4x = 165. Would a solution which does NOT hit the 165 be an optimal solution (as there is room for x and y to be bigger, as you did not hit the 165)??
 
Outlined said:
there is an error in v', you missed 2 * 165

Think yourself about why it is smart to put y + 4x = 165. Would a solution which does NOT hit the 165 be an optimal solution (as there is room for x and y to be bigger, as you did not hit the 165)??

Oh true, that was silly of me to ask! Haha! Thanks for the correction, I didn't see that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K