What Is the Optimal Sequence for Independent Study in Physics to Master QED?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate student seeking a structured approach to studying physics independently, aiming to reach a level of understanding sufficient for Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). The student has a foundation in calculus-based classical mechanics and basic knowledge of electromagnetism and special relativity. They express a desire to learn the necessary topics in a logical order, emphasizing the importance of understanding prerequisites before diving into new subjects. Responses suggest that while some topics can be studied concurrently, others are better approached sequentially. Participants recommend checking university resources for course prerequisites and consider pursuing a physics minor or major for a more guided learning path. The conversation highlights the challenge of identifying the right sequence of topics and the balance between structured learning and independent study.
wizrdofvortex
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in the first year of my undergrad, and want to pursue Physics independently of the main Physics course.

So I need to know what topics, AND IN WHAT ORDER, do I need to study to get a systematic knowledge of up to, say, Quantum Electrodynamics. (Undoubtedly this will take some time and I don't want to rush through it just for the sake of it.)

As of now I have a good grasp of calculus-based classical mechanics (right now we're studying classical mechanics based on the least action principle using Lagrangians/Hamiltonians, etc.), BASIC knowledge of electromagnetism (EXCLUDING the formation and traveling of electromagnetic waves), and BASIC knowlegde of the special theory of relativity involving very elementary mathematical techniques (that is, the usual concepts of time dilation, length contraction, simultaneity, etc.).
I do not yet know how special relativity arises from electromagnetism, or how to treat laws of electromagnetism taking special relativity into consideration.

To reiterate, I want to know in what order should I cover various areas in Physics (as in Classical Mechanics, then Electromagnetism, then Sp Relativity, and so on...) to have a grasp of all topics up to QED.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I need to know what topics, AND IN WHAT ORDER, do I need to study to get a systematic knowledge of up to, say, Quantum Electrodynamics.

Cover them at the same time. There is no right or wrong order. Afraid you will fail?

Are you one of those that reads the complete guide to winning a video game before you play it?
 
whs said:
Cover them at the same time. There is no right or wrong order. Afraid you will fail?

Are you one of those that reads the complete guide to winning a video game before you play it?

Point taken, but this is different. It's just that before starting any topic, I'd want to be familiar with the pre-requites. But it's exactly those prerequisites that are difficult to spot, even on the net.
Not that I intend to take shortcuts, certainly I'll get to know as I progress through the Physics course, but this is the kind of info I need to get a headstart on my own ahead of all that...

Edit : BTW I hate walkthroughs.
 
wizrdofvortex said:
So I need to know what topics, AND IN WHAT ORDER, do I need to study to get a systematic knowledge of up to, say, Quantum Electrodynamics.

Some of them can be done in parallel, some are better done in sequence. Does your university publish a list of courses that includes the required or recommended prerequisites for each one?
 
Is there a physics minor you can do? Why not go for the major?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top