What Is the Orbit of a Planet in a Gravitational Field with This Metric?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Orbit Planet
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32

Homework Statement


Find the orbit of a planet in a grav. field corresponding to the metric

d\tau^2=(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))dt^2-(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)

in the Newtonian limit with the initial conditions at t=0, x=R, dx/dt=\beta,0=y=z=dy/dt=dz/dt where alpha and beta are cositive constants.

Homework Equations


The Levi-Civita connexion and the geodesic equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculates the connexion coefficients and wrote down the 4 geodesic equations with the proper time as the parameter:

\frac{d^2t}{d\tau^2}+\frac{2\alpha^2x}{(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))} \frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dx}{d\tau}+\frac{2\alpha^2y}{(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dy}{d\tau}=0

\frac{d^2x}{d\tau^2}+\alpha^2x\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2=0

\frac{d^2y}{d\tau^2}+\alpha^2y\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2=0

\frac{d^2z}{d\tau^2}=0

I can solve the 4th equation of course:

z(\tau)=a\tau +b

and if I understand correctly, the Newtonian limit means that

\frac{dx^i}{d\tau}<<\frac{dt}{d\tau}

But I don't see how that can be applied here to simplify the equations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:

Homework Statement


Find the orbit of a planet in a grav. field corresponding to the metric

d\tau^2=(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))dt^2-(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)

in the Newtonian limit with the initial conditions at t=0, x=R, dx/dt=\beta,0=y=z=dy/dt=dz/dt where alpha and beta are cositive constants.

Homework Equations


The Levi-Civita connexion and the geodesic equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculates the connexion coefficients and wrote down the 4 geodesic equations with the proper time as the parameter:

\frac{d^2t}{d\tau^2}+\frac{2\alpha^2x}{(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))} \frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dx}{d\tau}+\frac{2\alpha^2y}{(1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2))}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dy}{d\tau}=0

\frac{d^2x}{d\tau^2}+\alpha^2x\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2=0

\frac{d^2y}{d\tau^2}+\alpha^2y\left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2=0

\frac{d^2z}{d\tau^2}=0

I can solve the 4th equation of course:

z(\tau)=a\tau +b

and if I understand correctly, the Newtonian limit means that

\frac{dx^i}{d\tau}<<\frac{dt}{d\tau}

But I don't see how that can be applied here to simplify the equations.


In the Newtonian limit you can set t = tau so \frac{dt}{d \tau} = 1.

And, of course, \frac{d^2t}{d \tau^2} =0.
So the equations become trivial to solve.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure?

d\tau^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}

And here, g_{ii}=-1, g_{00}=1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2) so

d\tau^2=(g_{00}-(dx/dt)^2-(dy/dt)^2-(dz/dt)^2)dt^2

and in the small speed limit, this only reduces to

d\tau^2\approx g_{00}dt^2

which is not just dtau=dt because g00 is not just 1.
 
quasar987 said:
Are you sure?

d\tau^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}

And here, g_{ii}=-1, g_{00}=1+\alpha^2(x^2+y^2) so

d\tau^2=(g_{00}-(dx/dt)^2-(dy/dt)^2-(dz/dt)^2)dt^2

and in the small speed limit, this only reduces to

d\tau^2\approx g_{00}dt^2

which is not just dtau=dt because g00 is not just 1.

You are right. Sorry, I had misread the spacetime interval and thought that the (1+alpha^2(x^2+y^2)) term went with the spatial part. So you have an expression for dt/dtau to replace in all the equations. Using the chain rule you can also get an expression for the second derivative d^2 t/dtau^2.

Sorry for my mistake.
 
Use the weak-field approximation, which gives a straight Newtonian potential of -
- \frac{1}{2}c^2( 1 + g_{00})

You can derive this by assuming the

g_{ij} = \eta_{ij} + h_{ij} where \eta is the flat space metric and h
is a small perturbation.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top