A What is the packet speed in the discrete case?

intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
I've been struggling with the problem below for some time. It is not a homework.

A simple bubble S is a spherical surface that expands with constant speed c. A vector bubble V also expands with the same constant speed c. There is a 3d vector associated with a V.

If two S bubbles touch, they are both reissued at the contact point, while two V bubbles never interact.

If an S and a V touch, they are reissued at the point where the line defined by the vector of V, passing through the origins, pierces the respective spherical surface.

Initially, a number of NS of simple bubbles and NV vectorial ones are randomly distributed in a given volume. The vectors are also random but biased in a preferred direction.

As the system evolves, it is supposed that the bubbles move as a packet with constant speed v at the direction of the resultant vector of all the V's vectors.

The space is either continuous or discrete, that is, we have two distinct cases.

What is the packet speed v in the discrete case?

Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
intervoxel said:
I've been struggling with the problem below for some time. It is not a homework.
intervoxel said:
A simple bubble S is a spherical surface that expands with constant speed c.
What is it that increases at c: radius, area, volume or something else?

intervoxel said:
A vector bubble V also expands with the same constant speed c. There is a 3d vector associated with a V.
Presumably this means the length of the vector increases at c.

intervoxel said:
If two S bubbles touch, they are both reissued at the contact point, while two V bubbles never interact.
What does 'reissued' mean? What happens if the 'reissued' bubbles touch or intersect with each other or some other bubbles?

intervoxel said:
If an S and a V touch, they are reissued at the point where the line defined by the vector of V, passing through
the origins, pierces the respective spherical surface.
What does 'reissued' mean? What does 'passing through the origins' mean?

intervoxel said:
Initially, a number of NS of simple bubbles and NV vectorial ones are randomly distributed in a given volume. The vectors are also random but biased in a preferred direction.
What are the initial sizes of the 'bubbles'? How are intersections dealt with?

intervoxel said:
As the system evolves, it is supposed that the bubbles move as a packet with constant speed v at the direction of the resultant vector of all the V's vectors.
Why do you suppose that the random interactions you have (partially) described would result in a constant (average) velocity?

intervoxel said:
The space is either continuous or discrete, that is, we have two distinct cases.
What does a 'discrete' space mean?

intervoxel said:
What is the packet speed v in the discrete case?
You need to go away and think about the answers to the questions I have asked, then you can build a model of your system and investigate how it evolves yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A problematic post by the OP has been deleted, and they are on a temporary time-out from PF. Thread is closed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top