What is the Partial Pressure of Air in a Cylinder at 10 atm and 298 K?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the partial pressures of nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) in a cylinder containing air at 10 atm and 298 K, the ideal gas law (PV = nRT) and the concept of mole fractions are essential. Given that air is 79% N2 and 21% O2 by volume, the mole fractions can be directly derived from these percentages. Using the formula for partial pressure (Pi = yi P), the partial pressure of N2 is 7.9 atm and that of O2 is 2.1 atm. Understanding that volume ratios correspond to mole ratios under the same conditions simplifies the calculation. This approach effectively clarifies how to determine the partial pressures based on the composition of air.
Ahalp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cylinder contains 1 L of air at 10 atm and 298 K.
Knowing that air is composed of 79% N2 and 21% O2 by VOLUME, calculate the initial partial pressure for both.

Homework Equations



Ideal Gas Law: PV = nRT

Mole Fraction: yi = moles of i / total moles

Partial Pressure: Pi = yi P

The Attempt at a Solution



The main thing throwing me off is that the composition is by Volume, not mass or moles.
I'm completely stumped on how to find the mole fractions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does Avogadro's law say about moles & volumes?
 
1 mol of every gas occupies the same volume (at the same pressure and temperature).

Thanks, it makes sense now :)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top