MHB What is the percent magnification of the microscope?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the percent magnification of a microscope, specifically for a virus measuring 3.0 x 10^-5 cm that appears 1.2 cm long under magnification. The formula used for this calculation is M = (perceived length / actual length) x 100, resulting in a magnification of 4,000,000. Participants explain the calculation process step-by-step, demonstrating how to manipulate the numbers and exponents to arrive at the final answer. The conversation emphasizes the simplicity of the calculation, whether done with a calculator or by hand. The clarity of the explanation helps others understand the magnification process effectively.
curtis2929
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A virus 3.0 X 10^-5 cm long appears to be 1.2cm long through a microscope. What is the percent magnification of the microscope?
Answer is 4000000. How did u get this answer?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take the perceived length, divide by the actual length, and then multiply by 100 to get the percentage of magnification $M$:

$$M=\frac{1.2\text{ cm}}{3.0\E{-5}\text{ cm}}\cdot100=4000000$$
 
Tyvm. I'll try figure out how you got it:)
 
curtis2929 said:
Tyvm. I'll try figure out how you got it:)

I just plugged the numbers into a calculator, but we could do it easily by hand:

$$M=\frac{1.2\text{ cm}}{3.0\E{-5}\text{ cm}}\cdot100$$

Cancel the cm units, and bring the 10 with the negative exponent up to the numerator with a positive exponent and use $100=10^2$:

$$M=\frac{1.2\E{5}}{3.0}\cdot10^2$$

Like bases, so add exponents:

$$M=\frac{1.2\E{7}}{3.0}$$

Multiply by $$1=\frac{10}{10}$$:

$$M=\frac{12\E{7}}{30}=\frac{12}{3}\E{6}=4.0\E{6}=4000000$$
 
Awesome I got it tyvm
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top