What is the Period of Revolution for a Triple Star System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chaose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Weird
AI Thread Summary
In a triple star system with two stars of mass m orbiting a central star of mass M, the stars revolve in a circular orbit of radius r, positioned at opposite ends of a diameter. The gravitational forces acting on each star do not cancel out, as they contribute to the net gravitational force experienced by the orbiting stars. The period of revolution can be derived using a modified version of Kepler's Third Law, accounting for the mass of both the central star and the orbiting stars. The final expression for the period is T^2 = (16π^2 * r^3)/(G*(4M+m)). Understanding the dynamics of the forces involved is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
chaose
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A triple star system consists of two stars each of mass m revoling in the same circular orbit of radius r around a central star of mass M. The two orbiting stars are always at opposite ends of a diameter of the orbit. Derive an expression for the period of the revolution of the stars.

I don't understand this problem that well. Any hints?

I thought that if the two stars are at opposite ends of the orbit, won't the gravitational forces from one cancel out the forces from the other star?
Then won't the period just be Kepler's Third law?

T^2 = (r^3)*(4pi^2)/(GM), G = universal gravitational constant, M = mass of central star, T = period of revolution, r = radius of the orbit, pi = 3.14159...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on each orbiting star is the sum of the forces from the other two stars. The net force on the central star will be zero, so it is stationary at the center of the motion of the other two stars. You can do this as a basic centripetal force problem if you get the forces right.
 
thanks, I believe I got it now.

My end result was
T^2 = (16pi^2 * r^3)/(G*(4M+m))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top