What is the physical meaning of the commutator of L^2 and x_i?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat1z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
mat1z
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Task: The task is to compute the commutator of L^2 with all components of the r-vector. It seems to be an unusual task for I was unable to find it in any book.

Known stuff: I know that [L_i,x_j]=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} x_k (\epsilon_{ijk} being the Levi-Civita symbol). Now I would go about as follows (summation implied):

My attempt: [L^2,x_j]=[L_iL_i,x_j]=L_i[L_i,x_j]+[L_i,x_j]L_i=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} (L_i x_k + x_k L_i)

Question: Is this correct? Is there a physical meaning to this result other than that they do not commute (with the usual implications)?

Regards, Matti from Germany
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's correct.

When two operators commute their eigenvectors coincide. In quantum mechanics it means that the corresponding physical magnitudes can be measured simultaneously.
 
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...
 
mat1z said:
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...

Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).
 
jdwood983 said:
Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).

Sorry, simultaneous measurements is what I was trying to say, of course. Thanks.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top