What Is the Physical Meaning of the Fourier Transform and FFT?

haiha
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I just know the Fourier series can be applied in differential equation solving, and that's all. Can anyone tell me the physical meaning of the Fourier transform, and fast Fourier transform too.

Thank you very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "physical meaning", and why do you think there is one?

The typical uses of the Fourier transform are just to obtain a different representation of the object under study. e.g. some questions about real-valued functions are easier to answer in terms of their frequency spectrum. Some questions about polynomials are easier to answer by knowing point-value pairs than it is by knowing the coefficients.

The fast Fourier transform is just a computationally efficient way of computing a Fourier transform.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top